Bill de hOra wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
1. deleted-entry is now part of the Atom namespace
"The Atom namespace is reserved for future forward-compatible revisions
of Atom." RFC4287, 6.2.
The rfc-editor should have picked this up.
Picked what up? The rfc-editor is not involved in the publishing of
I-D's. If this I-D is published as a Standards Track RFC, it would
specifically indicate that it is an update to RFC 4287 and would qualify
as a "forward-compatible revision of Atom". I believe that it's up to
the Area Director to determine whether or not to allow individual
submissions such as this to proceed along that route or whether a WG is
required.
2. a "trash" link relation is registered to point
to trash feeds.
Aside from what we talked about recently, the document only talks about
deletion in the past tense; there's no deletion mechanism specified.
There's no need to specify a deletion mechanism. A deleted-entry
element indicates that an entry has been removed from the feed and the
trash link relation points to a resource listing the entries that have
been removed. The mechanism used to remove those items is orthogonal to
both.