[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes

To: Karl Dubost <karl@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:36:44 +0100
Cc: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>, atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51D1F12C-58B9-4C14-A066-D7E4627C0207@xxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20080206110614.GA5643@xxxxxx> <FAEA6497-2BD6-4200-9C8A-BE074028DE9D@xxxxxx> <20080206150247.GB32206@xxxxxx> <51D1F12C-58B9-4C14-A066-D7E4627C0207@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666


Karl Dubost wrote:



Le 7 févr. 2008 à 00:02, Stéphane Bortzmeyer a écrit :

This page reminds there is a problem but Google is not mentioned.



    "More of an issue was the xhtml prefix,
    which caused problems for nearly two thirds
    of the aggregators tested. 3"

following the "3"

    "3 Including Google Reader, NewsGator Online,
    FeedDemon, Thunderbird 1.5.0.13, and RSS
    Bandit 1.5.0.17."



So do we know whether Google is aware of this problem?

Hmm. Joe, maybe you?


BR, Julian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
  - From: Julian Reschke

References:
- Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
  - From: Stéphane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
  - From: Karl Dubost
- Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
  - From: Stéphane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
  - From: Karl Dubost

Prev by Date: Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
Next by Date: Re: atom:id, urn:issn, feed archiving, and uniqueness
Previous by thread: Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
Next by thread: Re: Google Reader and Namespace Prefixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread