[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: atom:category excludes atom:* children?

To: "'atom-syntax'" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
From: "Brian Smith" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:25:03 -0700
In-reply-to: <47D81CE6.4070609@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <47D809F4.8010808@xxxxxxxxxx> <47D8151C.3000701@xxxxxxxxx> <47D81CE6.4070609@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciEbQryejfsD1feRWKm/l+FdKNYNwAAEwLw

Bill de hOra wrote:
> 2: the scheme is arguably not adequate to express something 
> like a category feed; it does tell you the vocabulary/type of 
> the category item, but not that there's an alternate/related resource.

I don't understand what you intend "alternate" to mean here. How can a feed be an alternate representation of a category? Is the feed supposed to list entries that have been marked with that category? Alternative categories that could be used instead? Something else?

Regards,
Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
  - From: Bill de hOra

References:
- atom:category excludes atom:* children?
  - From: Bill de hOra
- Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
  - From: Ben Ramsey
- Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
  - From: Bill de hOra

Prev by Date: Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
Next by Date: Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
Previous by thread: Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
Next by thread: Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread