Brian Smith wrote:
Bill de hOra wrote:2: the scheme is arguably not adequate to express something like a category feed; it does tell you the vocabulary/type of the category item, but not that there's an alternate/related resource.I don't understand what you intend "alternate" to mean here. How can a feed be an alternate representation of a category? Is the feed supposed to list entries that have been marked with that category? Alternative categories that could be used instead? Something else?
"related" might be better? Bill