[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing clients/suites?
- To: "Ben Ramsey" <benramsey.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Testing clients/suites?
- From: "Erling Wegger Linde" <erlingwl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:18:23 +0200
- Cc: "Atom Syntax" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+b5lrntpZL9Dvjw9mdInFYwmneulR173K9Hdn/cNlqU=; b=x5vs9bZVAkh7luI8G1mVc4mOwmC5MNHK96GaszHCE19QbQf0ZTSfMF/zOAtly5DVgPwuEYEgMc9LyXJTDWFnE6UeVcm90ANrkafb534whw8FmiSLbXqo46E9FpJ5XEqDiMPM5mWap/bpyKLtJ1Ktv4GkaxxW40Vf6PUKWjVcs9g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nA6C8ouitRM0SjOcN3QRQoGV9jgIrMqpGBq9XGdMROapoizfffQBo0+QQ4Zv076bgM4YOATH4SuITVTKnNNCB3PqMEQlalZ5O4r+RMUHiCy6ob+22MDZ6naUFOA20ExSLqwHgo7g/ixBEO2+AT0UhFbf6oSvgaVVqmlG7+/R9BU=
- In-reply-to: <47FD1073.1050606@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <47FD1073.1050606@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Have you looked at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3188
I'm not sure if it is flexible enough for you, but it's at least
another alternative to look at =)
- Erling
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Ben Ramsey <benramsey.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anyone know of any good AtomPub testing clients or suites that are
> extensible enough to accommodate foreign mark-up? Specifically, I'm
> wondering if any are flexible enough for me to add extra business rules for
> the foreign mark-up I'm using.
>
> I need something for our QA department to use as they test our AtomPub API.
>
> I've looked at things like http://www.witha.jp/eXeries/software/, but this
> isn't flexible enough, though this is definitely the style of tool I'm
> looking for since it would be easy for our QA folks to use.
>
> Any pointers would be very helpful. Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> Ben Ramsey
> http://benramsey.com/
>
>
--
Med vennlig hilsen
Erling Wegger Linde