[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future of the Atom Features Draft

To: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Future of the Atom Features Draft
From: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:22:55 +0200
Cc: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>, atom-syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <482C4DB3.9070100@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <482C4DB3.9070100@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


James,

will your evolved use case eventually lead to a public (draft) APPextension that overlaps with what the features draft expresses?


Jan


On May 15, 2008, at 4:50 PM, James M Snell wrote:

The Atom Features Draft has expired. There was some interestexpressed
in having it moved forward but there was no solid consensus formed
around the approach.  At this point, I don't really have the time or
need to move it forward (the original need for which it was developed
has evolved).  If anyone else feels that it is an important thing to
move forward, I will gladly hand over the xml of the source doc andwill
offer input however I can.

- James



--
Jan Algermissen
INTAKI . http://www.intaki.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future of the Atom Features Draft
  - From: James M Snell

References:
- Future of the Atom Features Draft
  - From: James M Snell

Prev by Date: Future of the Atom Features Draft
Next by Date: Re: Future of the Atom Features Draft
Previous by thread: Future of the Atom Features Draft
Next by thread: Re: Future of the Atom Features Draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread