Thanks Franklin, I should have
been more clear - by client reader I meant non-browser. For the browser
I'd use FF2 or FF3 since I have good connections to the FF a11y community.
I suppose for evaluating atom it doesn't really matter if I use a
web or non-web based reader. So I guess all I need is a set of feeds
that have been developed to test the implementation of all the atom features.
Pete Brunet
IBM Accessibility Architecture and Development
11501 Burnet Road, MS 9022E004, Austin, TX 78758
Voice: (512) 838-4594, Cell: (512) 689-4155
Ionosphere: WS4G
"Franklin Tse"
<peaceable_whale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
05/30/2008 11:23 AM
To
Pete Brunet/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
cc
"atom-syntax" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject
Re: test cases? accessible client
readers?
I don't have any test cases. However, regarding client
readers' accessibility, I think that the feed reading view of IE 7 or later
may have good accessibility support. It should be worth testing.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Pete Brunet" <brunet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 30 May, 2008 23:51
To: <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: test cases? accessible client readers?
> Has anyone developed a set of test cases for atom feeds? If
they existed
> I could evaluate them at least from a web based reader because I know
> Firefox has good accessibility support and I am in contact with their
> accessibility team. Are there any client readers that are have
good
> accessibility?
>
> Pete Brunet
>
> IBM Accessibility Architecture and Development
> 11501 Burnet Road, MS 9022E004, Austin, TX 78758
> Voice: (512) 838-4594, Cell: (512) 689-4155
> Ionosphere: WS4G
>