[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?
- To: atom-syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?
- From: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:14:58 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tMQlr66+JRAzaTGRh/D8cVMaGKxaLbb/GYbXg22rcFw=; b=IonSSzMrioUD5lzwyUe+uKFC8a7wZTjY9ZXp33BtzmIzyyUg92NidYeRpZv0lcggun FKUbEdOk9u0op8bsbBuE3iLLJ1T5n5tRpnVCpbs4UaSx1/t1FLyhkyFpm1pnNuT+pJCd C9fPuHMqJiAbvJoU4Re0UniOkz/jNCjMWr21E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eEPBwuIGvn2tomVx1ePRbQiC5x5pIxJ9Ugch41kurOzP7/5jTyDBWZ2lRDy/u3H2UP /kEQsFlCmQNeV81F2I0r+AjaWzNlR4M8cW1NIg/M+QKT3k541TwzZlIZB7k0OdRWWSEk TAB3aUflbYjAcpNbl0uILYqBkvPsFdRPYmfq4=
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409)
Ok, so we'd made quite a bit of progress on the Atom features draft a
while back and then I decided to sit and watch to see if there was a
strong enough need for the extensions. At this point, I have not seen
anyone jumping up and down demanding the functionality provided by the
Features draft so I'm wondering if I should just consider it Dead for
Good. Thoughts?