[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized
- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:41:58 +0200
- Cc: atom-syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QuVxTD4bgfrgDYO6up/zdBmnk0lui0LE8Znp7Zo7VOI=; b=bLNxMNZO64O+hrnLtQFcbYe2QMlJsrwrfKsO8YqiqR9dYLH+ebnnexvLMNPglOEUQj A/Nl7JV0/6Wrer3UK8DvdUcIwQincwI80kmV5J65JROWYms4nEcrsU35TPFWLrKkyCje Guq2I3wmGysdMG4ju/OT98gIyd+zuXXcBPYAs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=d60iTKT2Ewdc0DG+SuKFwZSlC3T1R1B38BWz2GVdj1/eMw6oyhDef2yGYCeQwUB+wT dTpCBzeAPgYnuX6zUzf/+CTtD5ohx3ldSrSBgdkmO+D5TcF0IG3FfwWLJlOACxqnuMgA na6zlwcTva87OlLY22e79CPM/WsMnbPDr+1hM=
- In-reply-to: <4A2D939C.9040609@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <4A2D939C.9040609@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi James,
that's great to hear! Is it thus likely that this will become an
Informational RFC in a foreseeable future?
And if so, will the current namespace
<http://purl.org/atompub/tombstones/1.0> be the final one (and e.g.
redirect to the RFC)?
Best regards,
Niklas
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As requested, the Atom Tombstones draft has been revitalized.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-06.txt
>
> Changed this from Experimental to Informational and updated the IPR
> boilerplate.
>
> - James
>
>