Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized

[jasnell@xxxxxxxxx]

 Excellent, glad to hear it.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

---

From:  Peter Keane

Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:17:16 -0500
To: Niklas Lindström<lindstream@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized

For what it's worth, on the slim chance that someone reads my (negative) comments on this draft on atom-syntax back when it was first proposed -- I now think those objections were ill-considered.   This looks v. good.

--peter keane

2009/6/10 Niklas Lindström <lindstream@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi James,

that's great to hear! Is it thus likely that this will become an
Informational RFC in a foreseeable future?

And if so, will the current namespace
<http://purl.org/atompub/tombstones/1.0> be the final one (and e.g.
redirect to the RFC)?

Best regards,
Niklas

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As requested, the Atom Tombstones draft has been revitalize
>
>  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-06.txt
>
> Changed this from Experimental to Informational and updated the IPR
> boilerplate.
>
> - James
>
>

--0015174c3712379f57046c027c8e--