[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom

To: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:41:05 +0200
Cc: atom-syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>, atom-protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <76C65F4C-7CEB-4F16-B9E7-35757E3D6D76@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <76C65F4C-7CEB-4F16-B9E7-35757E3D6D76@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666


Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:

Recent discussions on the atom-syntax mailing list has revealed interestin creating a new WG to look at several extensions of Atom. Here areseveral extensions that have been discussed:
1. Hierarchy operations including meta-publishing
2. In-line representation
3. Bi-directional text
Please respond to this email if you are interested in helping to explorea new WG further. Please also identify if you have a specific interestarea to consider for a potential new Atom WG.
...


4. Using the PATCH method (*) for partial updates to Atom entry documents.

BR, Julian

(*) <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dusseault-http-patch-14>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom
  - From: Lindsley Brett-ABL001

References:
- Exploring a new WG around Atom
  - From: Nikunj R. Mehta

Prev by Date: Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?
Next by Date: RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom
Previous by thread: Re: Inlining link target content (was: Exploring a new WG around Atom)
Next by thread: RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread