Re: extension for update properties

[Erik Wilde <dret@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Personally, I'm getting sick of the "can't set HTTP headers" scenario 
> driving abuse of HTTP.

just for the record: i was not proposing to re-create HTTP headers as 
atom extension. i was suggesting that maybe some information about the 
update properties of a feed might be useful, and my guess is that these 
might go well beyond the properties expressible in HTTP. but i do agree 
that if all we want to do is what HTTP can do, then we should definitely 
stick with HTTP headers.

cheers,

dret.