[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Input on request for link relation



On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Kris Zyp <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> I like "updates" or "notifications" -- "hub" seems specific to
> pubsubhubbub, whereas the pointer might be to a SIP notifications
> service, an XMPP PubSub service, or who knows what.
Actually, didn't SIP already define a relation name of "monitor" (and
"monitor-group" for notification of resource changes [1]? Why wouldn't
we follow that precedent (pubsubhubbub could use "monitor" that
couldn't they?). Or does monitor/monitor-group imply something different?
[1]
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe-02#section-5.1

Well spotted. For me to "monitor" or "watch" something requires conscious, ongoing effort by the client. The dictionary definition supports this: 'keep tabs on; keep an eye on; keep under surveillance; "we are monitoring the air quality"; "the police monitor the suspect's moves"'. It's a nitpick but I wonder if there are use cases for a "monitoring" interface (e.g. for polling) - for example a site offering a link that an uptime monitoring service could use to to test the various subsystems, or an actual monitoring service?

OTOH terms like "notify" and "push" imply a passive rather than active role for the client ("update" is out because it can be confused with "edit" - in that the resource itself is being updated).

Sam