Re: atom:feedset proposal

[Martin Atkins <mart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mo McRoberts wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I’ve come across a requirement in the course of a project I’m working on
> for a format which is a little richer and more readily-extensible than
> OPML. Creating something Atom-based was a natural fit for my needs, and
> so that’s what I’ve done.
> 
> Although I have no particular expectations of this supplanting OPML for
> subscription exchange, I’d like to offer a draft version of this spec
> for review by the (far more knowledgeable than me) folk here. I’ve had
> good initial feedback, but it really needs a wider audience.
> 


Did you consider simply making an Atom feed of items which themselves
represent feeds? Does this have any disadvantages over the new feedset
element you've defined?