[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Input on request for link relation

To: Bill de hOra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Input on request for link relation
From: Richard Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:20:31 -0500
Cc: "apps-discuss@xxxxxxxx" <apps-discuss@xxxxxxxx>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Hickson <ian@xxxxxxxx>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@xxxxxx>, Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>, owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Sam Johnston <samj@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4AFC937E.8060500@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <ca722a9e0909101030g6ccbc1e2t823f2abd19307bea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8860AD10-B0C5-4BEF-8C68-731973EF4046@xxxxxxx> <30ac519d0909101631m14782ce8vd085629237b0e444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C86DEC0A-6370-4C0B-98A9-3806F2014AE5@xxxxxxx> <21606dcf0909110445s78ea728cueb158ff588f394a5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <404dcbd20909110500j5394c43dve10264c01a7a6244@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <21606dcf0909110617y40586e53x213e5e8febc4a9e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0CB59F7B-A9DD-4866-8F70-A65869A79277@xxxxxxxx> <21606dcf0909160246i56c1dc55l43631423a542c41a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2B6D770A-58C5-48D6-AF52-7341812C9BFA@xxxxxxxx> <a23d87fa0911112218k1c133d24i8cc0e636eba3910c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <> <4AFC937E.8060500@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> IOW allow the link registry to define rel scopes. The url or clash thing 

> sucks and I don't want someone rolling up with a curies/qnames or some 
> other XML macrocrap proposal for Atom.

Yeah, it would be a huge mistake to use something that's pretty much 
already guaranteed to be part of your Atom infrastructure.  Far better to 
create yet another distributed naming scheme.

Not.

        r$

--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Bill de hOra

References:
- Input on request for link relation
  - From: Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Jan Algermissen
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: John Panzer
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Jan Algermissen
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Sam Johnston
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Hadrien Gardeur
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Sam Johnston
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Mark Nottingham
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Sam Johnston
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Mark Nottingham
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Sam Johnston
- Re: Input on request for link relation
  - From: Bill de hOra

Prev by Date: Re: Input on request for link relation
Next by Date: Re: Input on request for link relation
Previous by thread: Re: Input on request for link relation
Next by thread: Re: Input on request for link relation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread