[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03
Julian Reschke wrote:
Jan Algermissen wrote:
what is your opinion regarding the introduction of a link relation
that is the opposite of working-copy in order to being able to find
the versioned resource that the working copy I have is a working copy of?
I am undecided regarding the necessity, but without a working-copy-of
relation it seems the client would need to maintain that information
(the relationship or the fact that a given resource is a working copy)
I do not think this is really I-D publication relevant right now,
please understand it only as a side comment.
I have no problems adding this; the reason it hasn't been proposed was
that apparently CMIS didn't have a use case for it.
Al, any opinion on this from a CMIS point of view?
OK, I have added working-copy-of, and plan to submit the current draft
(also including the other changes we discussed) as
draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-04 later today.
A marked up version with diffs is available at
Best regards, Julian