[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tombstones Update
Very good question. Short answer is obviously yes it can be, but
calling that out explicitly in the spec is a good idea. There are
likely several concerns with this that would need to be considered...
such as what if both the entry and deleted-entry include valid
signatures but have been signed with different keys...
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Bob Wyman <bob@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can an at:delete-entry be signed in the same way that an Atom entry can be?
> Should I be concerned about an unsigned at:delete-entry which tells me to
> delete a signed entry?
> bob wyman
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:10 AM, James Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Another backwards compatible update... explicitly allowing for an
>> optional atom:source element as a child of at:deleted-entry.
>> - James
- James Snell