Quite a few important updates.
On May 20, 2010 8:03 AM, "James Snell" <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2010/5/20 Niklas Lindström <lindstream@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Ok, looks like we've got quite a bit good support for standalone
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1...
docs.. I'll add that in.
No prob. Thanks for the great feedback and input.
> Apart from the use cases already mentioned (XMPP, 403
> representations), I see potential for usi...
Putting these under the application/atom+xml media type would likely
> Two points come to mind if this is done:
> * What would the mime-type for deleted-entry documen...
cause badness. I'm thinking something like
Yeah, this is a concern of mine also. Need to make sure people don't go there.
> * For good measure, making sure that this doesn't lead to a pattern of
> PUT:ing deleted-entry do...
> Best regards,
- James Snell