Re: Atom Tombstones Done?

[Bob Wyman <bob@xxxxxxxx>]

Great. LGTM -- assuming those changes.

bob wyman

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, James Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Bob Wyman <bob@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> [snip]

>> I disagree. There may be no source feed at all... and therefore no
>> reason for atom:source
>
>
> You are, of course, correct. How about saying that "if there is a source
> feed, you MUST provide an atom:source" ???
>
>>

That works for me.