[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?

To: Mo McRoberts <mo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?
From: James Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:42:26 -0700
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WKhEQIdIXUwCNm3RqcBvH3l3AX7DUPyYMZ5qh+ITS28=; b=Z9Pf0DgJTpkHhIEtCPFLEzsw0cUVj+7d1BB2pUg0Sd9ErOhsfhELe/v4ScKSx5xw1k g+/Jb9qwTIdBAToRRAVt8wu5EpyYlrG57m5yuXYyYmRPs38hVxMSSBQAz/2iP1lMbL4a 4/yK5Ry56/45NJs5fgRh4/9FygQH4xNdm9cp0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MQo1jh19AWs8bqXAW+yc0/gMelKcy4Ddu0yyxqUzgJcJzla/7ppg5BPZvDFUWU5H/E EX+4N3OzXddlO84/5dhRlt2BUl8niZH4nTX3FyPJ64MGaa1jqC3+pAm48plO40zcUlvp 2fhVhorv3NV4grIXju1kdmQuqSkxyIxU05iGk=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinN-lOW2Z_Nw36CYZ0qiXXTh-OEK3ZeT-C2B4Ph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTintAESgi33LdLXd-QDmsm7iuhBlojm4a4b4n7_s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTilb9Reqyc34YFYkEwcpKgh2vVuCDeKqnYvPg356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinN-lOW2Z_Nw36CYZ0qiXXTh-OEK3ZeT-C2B4Ph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

This kind of time boxing certainly isn't unique... going to have to
give this one a bit of thought. Including these in the link extensions
draft would be trivial, just not sure if I'd be justified in doing so.

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Mo McRoberts <mo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 15:43, James Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  <link rel="..." href="..."
>>    notbefore="2010-06-10T12:00:00-08:00"
>>    notafter="2010-06-10T01:00:00-08:00" />
>
> 'notbefore' and 'notafter' are pretty ideal.
> [snip]

References:
- Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?
  - From: Mo McRoberts
- Re: Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?
  - From: James Snell
- Re: Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?
  - From: Mo McRoberts

Prev by Date: Re: Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?
Previous by thread: Re: Link extensions-related: link availability/expiry?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread