On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Alistair Miles <
alimanfoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Generally speaking, we've found this to be a very useful feature in several
> applications, and would be interested in revisiting James' original I-D if
> anyone else was.
>
> I think the draft would need updating to deal with a couple of relatively
> minor issues we've worked around, and the fact that the new tombstones draft
> [3] overlaps (see [4]). But for the most part, it works well as-is, for us
> at least.