Archive of atom-syntax, by thread

• PaceBriefExample posted, Robert Sayre
• RESEND: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Paul Hoffman
• On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Sam Ruby
    • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Robert Sayre
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Sam Ruby
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Robert Sayre
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Graham
      • Message not available
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Graham
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Robert Sayre
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Antone Roundy
      • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Bill de hÓra
  • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Graham
    • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: On SHOULD, MUST, and semantics, Mark Nottingham
• PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Bob Wyman
  • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Sam Ruby
    • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Robert Sayre
    • Cleanup phase, Tim Bray
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Graham
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Graham
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Sam Ruby
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Cleanup phase, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Cleanup phase - remaining Paces, Antone Roundy
  • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Bill de hÓra
    • RE: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Bob Wyman
      • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Antone Roundy
      • RE: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Bob Wyman
  • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Henry Story
    • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Eric Scheid
    • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Thomas Broyer
  • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Paul Hoffman
    • RE: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Bob Wyman
      • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Graham
      • RE: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Bob Wyman
      • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Robert Sayre
  • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Robert Sayre
    • Re: PubSub CAN NOT support Atom with existing "no duplicate id" constraint, Tim Bray
• IPTC News Metadata Framework Requirements specification issued for comment, Laurent Le Meur
• Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
  • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, James Tauber
  • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, A. Pagaltzis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
    • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Graham
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Fwd: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Graham
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Tim Bray
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, =?utf-8?b?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Julian Reschke
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
  • PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
• Fwd: For review: application/atom+xml, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: For review: application/atom+xml, Tim Bray
    • Re: For review: application/atom+xml, Mark Nottingham
    • Re: For review: application/atom+xml, Bill de hÓra
• Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
  • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Graham
    • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
    • PaceOptionalSummary, Tim Bray
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Julian Reschke
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Graham
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Eric Scheid
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Martin Duerst
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, James Tauber
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Tim Bray
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, James Tauber
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Henry Story
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Graham
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Graham
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, James Tauber
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Brett Lindsley
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Brett Lindsley
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Eric Scheid
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Brett Lindsley
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Andreas Sewe
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Walter Underwood
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, A. Pagaltzis
      • Link Comments, Brett Lindsley
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Eric Scheid
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Message not available
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Graham
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Roger B.
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Walter Underwood
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceOptionalSummary, Thomas Broyer
  • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Sam Hartman
    • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Sam Ruby
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Julian Reschke
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Graham
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Graham
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Graham
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Antone Roundy
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Graham
      • Re: Last Call: required summary or content?, Paul Hoffman
      • RE: Last Call: required summary or content?, Scott Hollenbeck
      • RE: Last Call: required summary or content?, Paul Hoffman
• Advertising not-yet-existent files... (was Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Bob Wyman
• draft-8 Issues - atom:head, Isofarro
• Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), John Cowan
  • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Norman Walsh
    • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Henri Sivonen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), John Cowan
    • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Graham
      • Repeating atom:name (was Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Antone Roundy
      • Re: Repeating atom:name (was Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), John Cowan
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), John Cowan
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Graham
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), John Cowan
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Dan Sandler
      • DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Robert Sayre
      • Re: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Dan Sandler
      • Re: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Paul Hoffman
      • Re: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Tim Bray
      • Re: DSig, Robert Sayre
      • Re: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Antone Roundy
      • RE: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Bob Wyman
      • Re: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Robert Sayre
      • RE: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Paul Hoffman
      • RE: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Bob Wyman
      • RE: DSig (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Paul Hoffman
      • RE: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Bob Wyman
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Eric Scheid
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Graham
      • remote content (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Robert Sayre
      • Re: remote content (was: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), John Cowan
      • Re: remote content, Robert Sayre
      • Re: remote content, Tim Bray
      • Re: remote content, Antone Roundy
      • Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray), Roger B.
      • Advertising not-yet-existent files... (was Re: Comments on atompub-format-08 (Modified by Tim Bray)), Bob Wyman
• Base URI and link rel="self", Thomas Broyer
  • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", Asbjørn Ulsberg
    • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", David Powell
      • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", Eric Scheid
      • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", David Powell
  • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", David Powell
    • Re: Base URI and link rel="self", Thomas Broyer
• xml:baseful test feed, Robert Sayre
  • Re: xml:baseful test feed, Phil Ringnalda
    • Re: xml:baseful test feed, Robert Sayre
• xml:base and html rendering, David Powell
  • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
    • Re: xml:base and html rendering, David Powell
    • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Bill de hÓra
  • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Phil Ringnalda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: xml:base and html rendering, David Powell
    • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Eric Scheid
    • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Anne van Kesteren
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Norman Walsh
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, =?utf-8?b?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, =?utf-8?b?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Norman Walsh
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, David Powell
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Graham
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Roger B.
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Sjoerd Visscher
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Sjoerd Visscher
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Tim Bray
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: xml:base and html rendering, Robert Sayre
• Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
  • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
    • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Walter Underwood
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, fantasai
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Graham
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
      • RE: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Scott Hollenbeck
      • RE: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Walter Underwood
      • RE: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Scott Hollenbeck
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Henri Sivonen
      • RE: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
      • RE: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Scott Hollenbeck
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Henri Sivonen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Henri Sivonen
    • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Graham
      • Re: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
• NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
  • Re: NoIndex, again, Antone Roundy
    • Re: NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
      • Re: NoIndex, again, John Panzer
  • Message not available
    • Re: NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
  • Re: NoIndex, again, Walter Underwood
    • Re: NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
      • Re: NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
      • robots processing instruction (was NoIndex, again), Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
  • RE: NoIndex, again, Bob Wyman
    • Re: NoIndex, again, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma
      • licenses [was Re: NoIndex, again, Kevin Marks
    • Re: NoIndex, again, Roger B.
  • Re: NoIndex, again, Paul Hoffman
• Standalone schema?, Henri Sivonen
  • Re: Standalone schema?, Robert Sayre
    • Re: Standalone schema?, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: Standalone schema?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Standalone schema?, Henri Sivonen
• PaceXmlContentWrapper, Antone Roundy
  • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Thomas Broyer
    • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Roger B.
  • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Graham
    • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Antone Roundy
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Graham
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Graham
  • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Graham
    • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Graham
      • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Thomas Broyer
  • Re: PaceXmlContentWrapper, Asbjørn Ulsberg
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt, Robert Sayre
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: typo in Text Constructs XHTML content? [was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt], Thomas Broyer
      • Re: typo in Text Constructs XHTML content? [was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt], Graham
    • Issues with draft -08, Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt, Julian Reschke
      • Placeholder alternate links (was: RE: Issues with draft -08, Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt), Bob Wyman
• How should this be rendered?, Graham
  • Re: How should this be rendered?, Eric Scheid
    • Re: How should this be rendered?, Graham
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Graham
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Robert Sayre
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Anne van Kesteren
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, fantasai
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Tim Bray
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Eric Scheid
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Tim Bray
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Graham
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Graham
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Tim Bray
      • Re: How should this be rendered?, Norman Walsh
• Trade mandatory xhtml:div for atom:content/@container?, Antone Roundy
  • Re: Trade mandatory xhtml:div for atom:content/@container?, A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Trade mandatory xhtml:div for atom:content/@container?, Thomas Broyer
    • Re: Trade mandatory xhtml:div for atom:content/@container?, Antone Roundy
      • Re: Trade mandatory xhtml:div for atom:content/@container?, Thomas Broyer
• PaceRecommendPlainTextContent: another "dangerous tags" example, Thomas Broyer
• IRI/URI, Porges
  • Re: IRI/URI, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: IRI/URI, Martin Duerst
    • Re: IRI/URI, Porges
      • Re: IRI/URI, Paul Hoffman
• What is a media type?, David Powell
  • Re: What is a media type?, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: What is a media type?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
• text/plain Base64?, Eric Scheid
  • Re: text/plain Base64?, Tim Bray
  • Re: text/plain Base64?, David Powell
• content @type, Eric Scheid
  • Re: content @type, Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: content @type, Henri Sivonen
• HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Julian Reschke
  • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Martin Duerst
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, James Aylett
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Tim Bray
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Norman Walsh
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Joe Gregorio
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Anne van Kesteren
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, =?utf-8?b?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Norman Walsh
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Tim Bray
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Robert Sayre
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Tim Bray
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Walter Underwood
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Anne van Kesteren
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, David Powell
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Graham
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Robert Sayre
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, =?utf-8?b?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Antone Roundy
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Antone Roundy
      • Using namespaces instead of 'type' (was: Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments), Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: Using namespaces instead of 'type' (was: Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments), Antone Roundy
      • Test documents (was:Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Test documents (was:Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments), Graham
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Antone Roundy
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Antone Roundy
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Robert Sayre
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, David Powell
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Asbjørn Ulsberg
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Robert Sayre
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Robert Sayre
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Asbjørn Ulsberg
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Thomas Broyer
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Thomas Broyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Klotz, Leigh
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Klotz, Leigh
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Robert Sayre
    • Re: HTML/XHTML type issues, was: FW: XML Directorate Reviewer Comments, Bill de hÓra
• Re: I don't get it, perhaps you could include an expanded explanation in a textual message, now that our machine protocol has broken down., Bill de hÓra
  • Re: I don't get it, perhaps you could include an expanded explanation in a textual message, now that our machine protocol has broken down., Henry Story
• atom:source interactions with xml:base/xml:lang, David Powell
  • Re: atom:source interactions with xml:base/xml:lang, Martin Duerst
    • Re: atom:source interactions with xml:base/xml:lang, David Powell
  • Re: atom:source interactions with xml:base/xml:lang, David Powell
• Comments links, David Powell
• Required elements for atom:source, David Powell
  • Re: Required elements for atom:source, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: Required elements for atom:source, Bob Wyman
• Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, Bob Wyman
  • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, Graham
    • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, Robert Sayre
    • RE: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, Bob Wyman
      • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, A. Pagaltzis
      • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, Eric Scheid
  • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, Walter Underwood
    • Re: Spaces supports slash:comments. Result = Duplicates Galore!, David Powell
• One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
  • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., David Czarnecki
  • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Robert Sayre
    • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Robert Sayre
      • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Graham
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Thomas Broyer
  • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Norman Walsh
  • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Tim Bray
    • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Thomas Broyer
      • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bill de hÓra
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Thomas Broyer
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bill de hÓra
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Thomas Broyer
      • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bill de hÓra
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Thomas Broyer
    • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Eric Scheid
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Eric Scheid
      • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we haveduplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
  • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., A. Pagaltzis
    • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., A. Pagaltzis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Antone Roundy
    • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Thomas Broyer
  • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Lenny Domnitser
    • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
    • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bill de hÓra
      • call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Henry Story
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bill de hÓra
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Henry Story
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Graham
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Henry Story
      • RE: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Robert Sayre
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Paul Hoffman
      • Re: call for a vote - was: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Henry Story
      • RE: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Bob Wyman
      • Re: One reason we have duplicates entries is that we have duplicate feeds..., Antone Roundy
• Obs on format-07, Bill de hÓra
  • Re: Obs on format-07, Tim Bray
  • Re: Obs on format-07, Antone Roundy
    • Re: Obs on format-07, Sam Ruby
      • Re: Obs on format-07, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Obs on format-07, Tim Bray
      • Re: Obs on format-07, Sam Ruby
      • Re: Obs on format-07, Robert Sayre
    • Re: Obs on format-07, Eric Scheid
  • Re: Obs on format-07, Robert Sayre
    • Re: Obs on format-07, Bill de hÓra
  • Re: Obs on format-07, David Powell
    • Extensions containing Atom elements (was: Obs on format-07), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Extensions containing Atom elements, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Extensions containing Atom elements, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Extensions containing Atom elements, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Extensions containing Atom elements, Robert Sayre
      • Re: Extensions containing Atom elements, Norman Walsh
  • Re: Obs on format-07, Robert Sayre
    • Re: Obs on format-07, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: Obs on format-07, Paul Hoffman
• PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Robert Sayre
  • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Sam Ruby
    • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Tim Bray
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Tim Bray
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Robert Sayre
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Sam Ruby
      • Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad, Robert Sayre

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.