Archive of atom-syntax, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for atom-syntax
Page 41 of 42
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Re: SEO spam, (continued)
- Atom as citation mechanism?,
Seairth Jacobs
- what about categories?,
Joe Gregorio
- Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Henri Sivonen
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Sam Ruby
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Henri Sivonen
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Danny Ayers
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Danny Ayers
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Sjoerd Visscher
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Sjoerd Visscher
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Randy Charles Morin
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Complex Content Element,
Sjoerd Visscher
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Complex Content Element,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Jeremy Allaire :: RSS-Data: A Proposed Format,
Gen.Kanai
- It's Named Atom, with 59 Votes,
Morbus Iff
- XSDs and C#,
Randy Charles Morin
- Progress,
Gary F
- RE: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Sean B. Palmer
- 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Morbus Iff
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Aaron Swartz
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Lucas Thompson
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Sean B. Palmer
- RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Danny Ayers
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Singing Banzo
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Gary F
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Joe Gregorio
- OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Evan Martin
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Morbus Iff
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
James Robertson
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Maciej Ceglowski
- RE: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Danny Ayers
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Sean B. Palmer
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Maciej Ceglowski
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Stefan Tilkov
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Sam Ruby
- Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Dave Winer
- Re: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom],
Bill Kearney
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Jason Brome
- Feed attachments,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- RE: Feed enclosures,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- RE: Feed enclosures,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Morbus Iff
- Re: Feed enclosures,
James Robertson
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Morbus Iff
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Morbus Iff
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Morbus Iff
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- RE: Feed enclosures,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Kevin Marks
- RE: Feed enclosures,
Danny Ayers
- RE: Feed enclosures,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Feed enclosures,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Tim Bray
- Re: Feed enclosures,
Dave Winer
- Re: Feed enclosures,
James Aylett
- Last n posts,
Dave Pawson
- Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element,
Sam Ruby
- Atom's double life?,
Seairth Jacobs
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Winer
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Winer
- Re: Atom's double life?,
James Robertson
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Winer
- Trolls (was RE: Atom's double life?),
Danny Ayers
- Re: Trolls (was RE: Atom's double life?),
Phil Wolff
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Pawson
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Sam Ruby
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Winer
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Atom's double life?,
David Jacobs
- Re: Atom's double life?,
James Aylett
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Pawson
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Bill Humphries
- Re: Atom's double life?,
James Aylett
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Dave Pawson
- Re: Atom's double life?,
James Aylett
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Henri Sivonen
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Ken MacLeod
- Re: Atom's double life?,
James Aylett
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Tim Bray
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Gary F
- Re: Atom's double life?,
Ken MacLeod
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Atom's double life?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Atom's double life?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Atom/CSS question,
David Jacobs
- introspection and search-results implemented into Lenya,
Michael Wechner
- [wxAtomClientApp] Summary,
Michael Wechner
- Updating Entry 205?,
Michael Wechner
- Atom Authentication passwords,
David Raynes
- OSCOM @ Seybold SF is confirmed,
Michael Wechner
- OSCOM @ Seybold SF,
Michael Wechner
- RE: Syndicating CSS?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Announce: Revised MetaWeblog API spec,
Dave Winer
- RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute],
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute],
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: CSS,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- format-00: 3.1.9 "atom:generator" Element,
Ken MacLeod
- format-00: feeds or extensible set of entities?,
Ken MacLeod
- RE: Atom 0.2 feedback,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Atom error-handling,
Tim Bray
- For shame! (was problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers),
Sam Ruby
- more 0.2 <generator> gripes,
Tim Bray
- Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Simon Willison
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Nelson Minar
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Aaron Swartz
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Evan Martin
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Ken MacLeod
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Maciej Ceglowski
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Anatoly Vorobey
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Nelson Minar
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Danny Ayers
- When Validated Lies Like a Rug ... And **can** this be fixed ?,
J. Scott Johnson
- Ziv's Metadata Rule,
Ziv Caspi
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Tim Bray
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Joe English
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Aaron Swartz
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Aaron Swartz
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Jeremy Gray
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Danny Ayers
- complaints addr when unparseable (Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Tom Myers
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Duncan Wilcox
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Jeremy Gray
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Graham Parks
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Sam Ruby
- Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Bill Kearney
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- doh, 0.2 multipart again,
Tim Bray
- Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again,
Zhang Yining
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again,
Sam Ruby
- RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Atom 0.2 schemas,
Tim Bray
- Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers,
Simon Willison
- AtomAPI Implementation,
Joe Gregorio
- RE: 0.2 question re content of <content>,
Simon Fell
- 0.2, do we *really* need multipart/alternative?,
Tim Bray
- RE: xml:lang attribute,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Maciej Cegłowski
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Bill Kearney
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Evan Martin
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Maciej Cegłowski
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Bill Kearney
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Maciej Cegłowski
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Evan Martin
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Bill Kearney
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Anatoly Vorobey
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Maciej Ceglowski
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Bill Kearney
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Evan Martin
- RE: xml:lang attribute,
Ziv Caspi
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Sam Ruby
- Re: xml:lang attribute,
Bill Kearney
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: xml:lang attribute,
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- OSCOM Hackathon/Sprint at Seybold,
Michael Wechner
- RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?),
Joe Madia
- Atom and RDF,
Joe Gregorio
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Shelley Powers
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Shelley Powers
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Shelley Powers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Tim Bray
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Sam Ruby
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Shelley Powers
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Tim Bray
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Graham Parks
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Sean B. Palmer
- RDF and Managability,
Sean B. Palmer
- RE: RDF and Managability,
Shelley Powers
- IRC Channel for Pie/Atom/Echo (was: Re: RDF and Managability),
Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Sean B. Palmer
- Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Versioning and Namespaces,
Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Sam Ruby
- Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Sam Ruby
- RE: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Shelley Powers
- Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Maciej Cegłowski
- RE : Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF),
Laurent Le Meur
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Tim Bray
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Joe English
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Sam Ruby
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Joe English
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Tim Bray
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Atom and RDF,
Shelley Powers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Rick Thomas
- Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom and RDF [removed crosspost],
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Bill Kearney
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Lance Lavandowska
- link (@type, @size, @etc) [was: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF],
Robert Sayre
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Antone Roundy
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Sam Ruby
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Bill Kearney
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Walter Underwood
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Eric Scheid
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
James Aylett
- enclosures: types,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: enclosures: types,
Robert Sayre
- Re: enclosures: types,
Danny Ayers
- Re: enclosures: types,
Robert Sayre
- Re: enclosures: types,
Danny Ayers
- Re: enclosures: types,
Robert Sayre
- Re: enclosures: types,
Antone Roundy
- Re: enclosures: types,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: enclosures: types,
Antone Roundy
- Re: enclosures: types,
Roger B.
- Re: enclosures: types,
Danny Ayers
- Re: enclosures: types,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: enclosures: types,
James Aylett
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
- enclosures: type and length,
Lucas Gonze
- Re: enclosures: type and length,
Eric Scheid
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF,
Danny Ayers
Page 41 of 42
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.