Archive of atom-syntax, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for atom-syntax
Page 8 of 42
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
Revised Feed Ranking Draft,
James M Snell
Entries in multiple language,
Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-license-03.txt,
James M Snell
Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James M Snell
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
Henry Story
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James Holderness
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James M Snell
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James Holderness
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James M Snell
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James Holderness
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James Holderness
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt,
James M Snell
- Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
James M Snell
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
James Holderness
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
James M Snell
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
Eric Scheid
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
James M Snell
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
James Holderness
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
Phil Ringnalda
- Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt),
Mark Nottingham
Unofficial Last Call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-02.txt,
James M Snell
Deployment: millions,
A. Pagaltzis
[feedvalidator] Two entries with the same value for atom:updated,
Julian Reschke
Arr! Avast me hearties!,
Eric Scheid
[feedvalidator] ' is not HTML,
Anne van Kesteren
[Off topic] FYI: Microsoft Gadgets and RSS 2.0,
James M Snell
FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
David Powell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Eric Scheid
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Eric Scheid
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Eric Scheid
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James Holderness
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Eric Scheid
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James Holderness
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James Holderness
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James Holderness
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Antone Roundy
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Antone Roundy
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
James M Snell
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: FYI: Updated Index draft,
Mark Nottingham
Atom 1.0 ootb with MT3.2,
Bill de hÓra
Structured Publishing -- Joe Reger shows the way...,
Bob Wyman
Atom Comments Extension,
James M Snell
Question regarding specification 4.1.1,
Roland Jungwirth
Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Stefan Eissing
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Robert Sayre
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Feed History -04,
Byrne Reese
- RE: Feed History -04,
Byrne Reese
- RE: Feed History -04,
Lindsley Brett-ABL001
- Re: Feed History -04,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Robert Sayre
- Re: Feed History -04,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Robert Sayre
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Robert Sayre
- Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Robert Sayre
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Robert Sayre
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Antone Roundy
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Eric Scheid
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Eric Scheid
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Eric Scheid
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: Are Generic Link Relations Always a Good Idea? [was: Feed History -04],
Robert Sayre
- Re: Feed History -04,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Feed History -04,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Feed History -04,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Feed History -04,
James Holderness
- Re: Feed History -04,
Stefan Eissing
- RE: Feed History -04,
Byrne Reese
- RE: Feed History -04,
Byrne Reese
- RE: Feed History -04,
Lindsley Brett-ABL001
- RE: Feed History -04,
Byrne Reese
- Re: Feed History -04,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Feed History -04,
Robert Sayre
- Re: Feed History -04,
James M Snell
- New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Thomas Broyer
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Thomas Broyer
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Eric Scheid
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Eric Scheid
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Eric Scheid
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Antone Roundy
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
James M Snell
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Antone Roundy
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04],
Robert Sayre
- Re: Feed History -04,
Henry Story
"Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Bob Wyman
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Henry Story
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Graham
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
James M Snell
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Graham
- RE: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Bob Wyman
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Danny Ayers
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Danny Ayers
- The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
Bob Wyman
- Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
Mark Nottingham
- Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
James M Snell
- Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
Roger B.
- Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
Graham
- Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds",
Robert Koberg
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Eric Scheid
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Walter Underwood
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Walter Underwood
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Walter Underwood
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Tim Bray
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Eric Scheid
- Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.,
Dan Brickley
Atom for internal use? <link>, etc,
blaine
Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James Aylett
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Karl Dubost
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Karl Dubost
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Henry Story
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Henry Story
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Antone Roundy
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Roger B.
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Antone Roundy
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Roger B.
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Karl Dubost
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Karl Dubost
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Karl Dubost
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Roger B.
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Graham
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Antone Roundy
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
A. Pagaltzis
- Message not available
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
James M Snell
- draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.txt [was: Re: Don't Aggregrate Me],
James M Snell
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
A. Pagaltzis
- RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Eric Scheid
Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
A. Pagaltzis
Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Joe Gregorio
RE: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Bob Wyman
Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Antone Roundy
Re: Don't Aggregrate Me,
Walter Underwood
Feed History: stateful -> incremental?,
Mark Nottingham
Updated License and Expires Extensions,
James M Snell
If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- RE: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Sam Ruby
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Walter Underwood
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
James M Snell
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Walter Underwood
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
=?utf-8?b?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Antone Roundy
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Martin Duerst
- RE: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Martin Duerst
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Walter Underwood
- RE: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Joe Gregorio
- RE: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Sam Ruby
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Tim Bray
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Justin Fletcher
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
James M Snell
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Justin Fletcher
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
James M Snell
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Tim Bray
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Tim Bray
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Graham
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Tim Bray
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Henri Sivonen
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Walter Underwood
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Henri Sivonen
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Tim Bray
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!,
Graham
geolocation in atom:author?,
Eric Scheid
- Re: geolocation in atom:author?,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: geolocation in atom:author?,
Peter Robinson
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Tim Bray
- RE: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Bob Wyman
- RE: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Peter Robinson
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
James M Snell
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
A. Pagaltzis
- RE: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Bob Wyman
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
James M Snell
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
'A. Pagaltzis'
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
James M Snell
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Henry Story
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Robert Sayre
- RE: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Bob Wyman
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
James M Snell
- Message not available
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
James M Snell
- Message not available
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Robert Sayre
- RE: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Bob Wyman
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Eric Scheid
- RE: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation inatom:author?),
Bob Wyman
- Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?),
Eric Scheid
Re: geolocation in atom:author?,
Peter Robinson
Re: geolocation in atom:author?,
Karl Dubost
Re: geolocation in atom:author?,
Eric Scheid
OpenSearch and Atom Prototype,
James M Snell
Where's the Registry of Link Relations?,
Robert Sayre
FYI: Expires Extension Draft,
James M Snell
Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Extension spec updates,
James M Snell
Feed History -03,
Mark Nottingham
Page 8 of 42
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.