[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Internet Draft on registering IDNs

To: "'IDN registration policy list'" <idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Internet Draft on registering IDNs
From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn-reg-policy.amc+0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:57:07 +0000
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/idn-reg-policy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <idn-reg-policy.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:idn-reg-policy-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Reply-to: IDN registration policy list <idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

Benny Lipsicas <benny@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> will the holder of family.co.il have any guarantee that no one else
> registers family<in Hebrew>.co.il?

No.  No one expects big.com and large.com to be the same site, and your
example is no different.

Trying to block registrations that have the same meaning as other
registrations would be hopelessly difficult, and even if it could be
done, I think most registrants and all registries would hate such a
policy.

AMC

References:
- Re: New Internet Draft on registering IDNs
  - From: tedd
- RE: New Internet Draft on registering IDNs
  - From: Benny Lipsicas

Prev by Date: RE: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
Next by Date: Re: confusability
Previous by thread: RE: New Internet Draft on registering IDNs
Next by thread: Re: New Internet Draft on registering IDNs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread