[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language

To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:42:16 +0200
Cc: idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/idn-reg-policy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <idn-reg-policy.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:idn-reg-policy-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: NIC France
References: <>
Sender: owner-idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 12:57:09PM -0700,
 Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 6 lines which said:

> Humor alert: in today's San Jose Mercury sports section, a talented 
> young baseball pitcher from Venezuela  is described as a "Wünderniño".

The most funny thing is that "wunder" does not have an umlaut
(diaeresis)... 

wunderlich, wunderbar, etc

So, the paper's sentence is no more german than "Asereje" is spanish.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

References:
- Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC

Prev by Date: Re: model with overlapping variants
Next by Date: Re: Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language
Previous by thread: Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language
Next by thread: Re: Why we don't want to restrict zones to a single language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread