[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin

To: idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:25:13 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/idn-reg-policy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <idn-reg-policy.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:idn-reg-policy-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-idn-reg-policy@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 5:09 PM +0200 4/22/03, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:

1. the IDNA solution is inappropriate and violates the DNS architecture.

This is the wrong list for that discussion. Please take it elsewhere. Thanks!

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

References:
- Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Prev by Date: Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
Next by Date: Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
Previous by thread: Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
Next by thread: Re: Comparison of hoffman-idn-reg and jseng-idn-admin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread