[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Comparisons document

On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:

> One thought is to have each proposal include an appendix with a detailed 
> list of how it meets or doesn't meet each requirement from the requirements 
> draft. 

  that sounds great.  however, i did not seem to have seen 
any article in this regard.

> This would be easier if the requirements document 
> either had finer-grained headings or each requirement had its own short 
> identifier, such as [Preserve DNS concepts] and [Generate same responses].

good too.

> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium

김 경석, 부산대 정보 컴퓨터 공학부; 
KIM Kyongsok/GIM Gyeongseog, Busan National Univ.
gimgs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://hangeul.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/
Ph: +82-(0)51-510-2292, Fax: +82-(0)51-515-2208