Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]

At 15.01 +0800 00-06-27, James Seng wrote:

Lets not go to the detail of the design. We are working on the requirements.

Understood, sorry...

paf

References:
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: James Seng
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: Patrik Fältström
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: James Seng