[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]

To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>, bill@xxxxxxxxxxx (J. William Semich), James Seng <jseng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, RJ Atkinson <rja@xxxxxxxx>, keka@xxxxx
Subject: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:22:20 +0200
Cc: idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 09.15 -0700 00-06-28, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:

"The protocol MUST specify canonicalization, it MUST specify exactly where in the DNS that canonicalization happens and does not happen, it MUST specify how additions to ISO 10646 will affect the stability of the DNS and the amount of work done on the root DNS servers."

Great!

paf

References:
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Next by Date: RE: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread