[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Document Status?

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status?
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 07:05:17 -0700
Cc: "'idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
References: <"Your message with ID" <>
Sender: owner-idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 03:26 PM 9/4/2002 +0200, Erik Nordmark wrote:

This split was made to limit the possibility that stringprep, which is
needed by other WGs such as ips, be unnecessarily held up due to
concerns with IDN(A).

cool. tnx.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

References:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Erik Nordmark

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by Date: [idn] IDNA text presentation (was Document Status?)
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread