[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[idn] Re: Document Status?
- To: Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [idn] Re: Document Status?
- From: Simon Josefsson <jas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 04:15:51 +0200
- Cc: idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <> (Dave Crocker's message of "Tue, 03 Sep 2002 23:14:55 -0700")
- References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
- Sender: owner-idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[snip]
> Are you claiming that a) the behavior is not well understood, or that
> b) the working group did not reach rough consensus on this matter? If
> you are claiming anything else, then it is not a "failure".
[snip]
You said people in this thread argued without having detailed specific
scenarios that fail in mind. I tried to provide some specific such
scenarios that I had in mind. I don't claim any of the above, nor
that IDN is a failure.