Re: [idn] Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)

["Mark Davis" <mark.davis@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm curious: why do you think that everyone would be satisfied with Latin
characters only, and no non-Latin characters?

Mark
__________________________________
http://www.macchiato.com
► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Crispin" <mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <dcrocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <paf@xxxxxxxxx>; <ietf-imaa@xxxxxxx>;
<idn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ietf-822@xxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <ietf-pop3ext@xxxxxxx>;
<lemonade@xxxxxxxx>; <discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ietf-imapext@xxxxxxx>;
<ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx>; <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, 2003 Oct 27 11:10
Subject: [idn] Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)


> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Keith Moore wrote:
>
>  >> Thanks for taking a stab at a problem statement.  I'd like to drill down
>  >> on this just a bit.
>  >> What is the source of the "growing need"?  Is it:
>  >> [snip]
>
>
> I agree that this needs to be stated, but someone other than me will have
> to do it.
>
> I believe that the primary push for this functionality comes from regions
> which use Latin alphabetics with diacriticals; and that most individuals
> in regions which do not use Latin script are accept the use of Latin
> script for multinational interchange.  In many regions where Latin
> diacriticals are used, there is no acceptable transform of a surname to a
> form that does not use diacriticals.  Simply omitting the diacritical
> causes (at least to the inhabitants of those regions) a misspelling.
>
> This set of beliefs naturally biases how I approach the problem.  The
> problem statement must be free of bias, including mine.
>
> -- Mark --
>
> http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
> Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
> Si vis pacem, para bellum.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>