User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
John C Klensin wrote:
(i) ICANN is still assuming that this is a registry
issue. As such, if someone else starts guessing at what
a registry is doing, we may get into trouble, especially
since the tables may not show all of the relevant
registry rules and restrictions.
Hmmm... GNU libidn already seems to be trying to use machine-readable
tables. I had a look at the GNU libidn page:
This draft seems to be talking about bundling and blocking, which your
draft talks about too. What happened here? Did Paul decide to let his
expire?
Anyway, my only reason for trying to get machine-readable tables was to
figure out which Unicode character categories were being used. Another
way to get this info is to simply ask the registries. Or, we can suggest
a list of categories and see if they would be happy with a nameprep-bis
that limits the characters to those categories.