Archive of ietf-822, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-822

Page 13 of 13
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: Text, Ashley Yakeley, 10/21/1998
The Passing of Dr. Jon Postel, Allen Gwinn, 10/20/1998
Re: Text, Randall Gellens, 10/19/1998
Text, Ashley Yakeley, 10/18/1998
Re: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, D. J. Bernstein, 10/17/1998
Worldwide, xjtwgops, 10/17/1998
Re: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10/09/1998
Re: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Dave Crocker, 10/08/1998
RE: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Chris Newman, 10/08/1998
Re: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Randall Gellens, 10/08/1998
RE: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 10/08/1998
RE: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Chris Newman, 10/08/1998
RE: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 10/08/1998
Re: Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Paul Overell, 10/08/1998
Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10/08/1998
Re: utf-8 vs Base64 in LZJU90 and FS, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10/08/1998
utf-8 vs Base64 in LZJU90 and FS, Al Costanzo, 10/08/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00.txt, Randall Gellens, 10/07/1998
draft-gellens-format-00.txt, Clive D.W. Feather, 10/06/1998
Mime type statistics, Jacob Palme, 09/25/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, ruth moulton, 09/24/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, John Gardiner Myers, 09/23/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Antony Bowesman, 09/23/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09/23/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Ned Freed, 09/23/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, ruth moulton, 09/23/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Chris Newman, 09/22/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Mark Crispin, 09/22/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, John Mani, 09/22/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Ned Freed, 09/22/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, John Mani, 09/22/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Anthony Romano, 09/22/1998
Re: MIME messages without MIME-Version header, Ned Freed, 09/22/1998
MIME messages without MIME-Version header, John Mani, 09/22/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Ned Freed, 09/22/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Nathaniel Borenstein, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Rick Troth, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Ned Freed, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Rick Troth, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Chris Newman, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Ned Freed, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Chris Newman, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Valdis . Kletnieks, 09/21/1998
Re: LZJU90 compression example(s), Al Costanzo, 09/19/1998
Re: application/fs vs. fs/*, Pete Resnick, 09/14/1998
Re: Transport Level Compression?, Ned Freed, 09/13/1998
Re: Transport Level Compression?, Ned Freed, 09/13/1998
Re: The MIME version number, Ned Freed, 09/12/1998
Re: The MIME version number, Al Costanzo, 09/12/1998
Re: application/fs vs. fs/*, Al Costanzo, 09/12/1998
Re: application/fs vs. fs/* (was Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME), Pete Resnick, 09/11/1998
application/fs vs. fs/* (was Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME), Nathaniel Borenstein, 09/11/1998
Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME, Pete Resnick, 09/11/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Chris Newman, 09/11/1998
Archive/Filesystem formats (was Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding ...), Chris Newman, 09/11/1998
Re: The MIME version number, Ned Freed, 09/11/1998
Re: The MIME version number, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09/11/1998
Re: Transport Level Compression?, John C Klensin, 09/10/1998
C-T-E compression, Al Costanzo, 09/10/1998
Transport Level Compression?, Al Costanzo, 09/10/1998
Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME, Al Costanzo, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Laurence Lundblade, 09/10/1998
The MIME version number, Al Costanzo, 09/10/1998
Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME, Antony Bowesman, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Al Costanzo, 09/10/1998
Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME, Al Costanzo, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Dan Wing, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09/10/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Ned Freed, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, John C Klensin, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Steve Dorner, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Dave Crocker, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Pete Resnick, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Al Costanzo, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09/09/1998
Re: New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Chris Newman, 09/09/1998
New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME, Al Costanzo, 09/09/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Kai Henningsen, 09/03/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Chris Newman, 09/01/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Randall Gellens, 09/01/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Laurence Lundblade, 09/01/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09/01/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Chris Newman, 08/31/1998
New mailing list for discussing mail header registry, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 08/29/1998
Standard for quoting in plain-text messages., Jacob Palme, 08/27/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Evan Kirshenbaum, 08/26/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/25/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Rick Troth, 08/25/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/22/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Laurence Lundblade, 08/21/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Rick Troth, 08/21/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Rick Troth, 08/21/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Laurence Lundblade, 08/21/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Dave Crocker, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Ned Freed, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Keith Moore, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Randall Gellens, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, John W. Noerenberg, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Randall Gellens, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Steve Dorner, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Randall Gellens, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Pete Resnick, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Laurence Lundblade, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Chris Newman, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Keith Moore, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Chris Newman, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Daniel Glazman, 08/20/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Daniel Glazman, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Pete Resnick, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Laurence Lundblade, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Pete Resnick, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Laurence Lundblade, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Pete Resnick, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Ned Freed, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Ned Freed, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Keith Moore, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Pete Resnick, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Pete Resnick, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Laurence Lundblade, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Keith Moore, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Laurence Lundblade, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Randall Gellens, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Chris Newman, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Pete Resnick, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Chris Newman, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Keith Moore, 08/19/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Chris Newman, 08/19/1998
Re: why not use *ML (was: format=flowed : why not use HTML?), Laurence Lundblade, 08/19/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Ian Bell, 08/19/1998
why not use *ML (was: format=flowed : why not use HTML?), Daniel Glazman, 08/18/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Laurence Lundblade, 08/18/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Ned Freed, 08/18/1998
Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Jamie Zawinski, 08/18/1998
RE: format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Michael A Quinlan, 08/18/1998
format=flowed : why not use HTML?, Keith Moore, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Ned Freed, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Ian Bell, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/18/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Ian Bell, 08/18/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Ned Freed, 08/17/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Jacob Palme, 08/17/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Ned Freed, 08/17/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Jacob Palme, 08/17/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Ned Freed, 08/17/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Ian Bell, 08/17/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Harald Alvestrand, 08/17/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/14/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Randall Gellens, 08/14/1998
Re: draft-gellens-format-00, Rick Troth, 08/14/1998
draft-gellens-format-00, Ian Bell, 08/14/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Ned Freed, 07/10/1998
Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT, Pete Resnick, 07/10/1998
survey results, Keith Moore, 05/29/1998
test of your mailer's ability to reply to RFC 2047, Keith M��re, 05/27/1998
implementation of RFC 2047 encoded-words in reply, Keith Moore, 05/27/1998
RFC 822 reference pages available, D. J. Bernstein, 05/12/1998
Re: This is text/plain format=paragraphs - how does reply work?, Evan Kirshenbaum, 04/21/1998
Re: This is text/plain format=paragraphs - how does reply work?, Randall Gellens, 04/20/1998
SAVE CHILDREN'S LIVES, ep86, 04/17/1998
Re: This is text/plain format=paragraphs - how does reply work?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04/14/1998
Hot Quick & Easy Money Maker!!!!!!!, h8dr, 04/09/1998
Re: This is text/plain format=paragraphs - how does reply work?, Erik Huizer, 04/09/1998
This is text/plain format=paragraphs - how does reply work?, Laurence Lundblade, 04/08/1998
BEANIE BABY LOVERS!!, 6uv4, 03/30/1998
BEANIE BABY LOVERS!!, xw0q, 03/29/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Chris Newman, 03/23/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Dave Crocker, 03/20/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Jacob Palme, 03/20/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Laurence Lundblade, 03/19/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Chris Newman, 03/19/1998
This is text/plain wrap=yes - how does it look?, Laurence Lundblade, 03/19/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Laurence Lundblade, 03/19/1998
Re: Some notes about the wrap=yes/no or Text/Paragraph issue, Bart Schaefer, 03/17/1998
Some notes about the wrap=yes/no or Text/Paragraph issue, Jacob Palme, 03/17/1998
draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd-06.txt: TURN, Dan Wing, 03/16/1998
draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd-06.txt, Dan Wing, 03/16/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Dave Crocker, 03/16/1998
RE: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/16/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/16/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/16/1998
[no subject], drle, 03/15/1998
Offroad 151 drives anywhere - even underwater!, qwaf, 03/15/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Bart Schaefer, 03/14/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Pete Resnick, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/13/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/13/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Steve Dorner, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Pete Resnick, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Steve Dorner, 03/13/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Dave Crocker, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Steve Dorner, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Steve Dorner, 03/13/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Pete Resnick, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Ned Freed, 03/13/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Laurence Lundblade, 03/13/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Chris Newman, 03/12/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Chris Newman, 03/12/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Pete Resnick, 03/12/1998
MIME torture test, John Mani, 03/12/1998
Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Steve Dorner, 03/12/1998
RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Larry Osterman (Exchange), 03/12/1998
text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no, Chris Newman, 03/12/1998
RE: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 03/11/1998
RE: overdefining text/plain?, Dan Kohn, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Bill Janssen, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Pete Resnick, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 03/11/1998
Re: Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?), Steve Dorner, 03/11/1998
RE: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 03/11/1998
Re: Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?), Ned Freed, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/11/1998
Re: Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?), Michael A Quinlan, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Michael A Quinlan, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Michael A Quinlan, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Pete Resnick, 03/11/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, ruth moulton, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Erik Huizer, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Erik Huizer, 03/11/1998
RE: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/11/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Ned Freed, 03/11/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/10/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Laurence Lundblade, 03/10/1998
Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?), Laurence Lundblade, 03/10/1998
RE: overdefining text/plain?, Dan Kohn, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Bill Janssen, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Keith Moore, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Chris Newman, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Bill Janssen, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Chris Newman, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 03/10/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 03/10/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, John C Klensin, 03/10/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, Michael_Harer, 03/09/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, Todd Vierling, 03/09/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, Steve Dorner, 03/09/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, Michael A Quinlan, 03/09/1998
Re: This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, Bart Schaefer, 03/09/1998
This is text/paragraph - how does it look?, Laurence Lundblade, 03/08/1998
Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02/24/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Rick Troth, 02/20/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 02/20/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Ned Freed, 02/19/1998
Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal), Ned Freed, 02/19/1998
Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal), Roy T. Fielding, 02/19/1998
Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal), Jacob Palme, 02/19/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02/19/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Steve Dorner, 02/19/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Chris Newman, 02/19/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Valdis . Kletnieks, 02/19/1998
Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal), Ned Freed, 02/19/1998
Re: text/paragraph summary, Jacob Palme, 02/19/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed, 02/19/1998
Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 02/19/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 02/19/1998
text/paragraph summary, Chris Newman, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Jacob Palme, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Steve Dorner, 02/18/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Dan Wing, 02/18/1998
Re: overdefining text/plain?, Chris Newman, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Chris Newman, 02/18/1998
overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Rick Troth, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Jacob Palme, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Dan Wing, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Ian Bell, 02/18/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Ian Bell, 02/17/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02/17/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Ned Freed, 02/17/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Chris Newman, 02/16/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Rick Troth, 02/16/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Ian Bell, 02/16/1998
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Jacob Palme, 02/16/1998
Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, ruth moulton, 02/16/1998
Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal, Ian Bell, 02/16/1998
Do You Like New Inventions?, rkoa, 02/15/1998
Lasers/Optics/Optical Tables - Save!, 9LnhH0281, 12/06/1997
Let Us Do Your Bulk Emailing Advertising !!!, fyrlxbz0N, 11/05/1997
Re: mail to fax, ruth moulton, 10/27/1997
Re: mail to fax, Allen Gwinn, 10/27/1997
Re: mail to fax, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10/27/1997
mail to fax, ruth moulton, 10/27/1997
Re: redirected mail, Keith Moore, 10/07/1997
redirected mail, Gerardo Ocampo, 10/06/1997
rfc 2119 violation, D. J. Bernstein, 08/09/1997
please don't feed the Keith, Masataka Ohta, 08/08/1997
Re: please don't feed the Dan, Chris Newman, 08/08/1997
Re: please don't feed the Dan, Allen Gwinn, 08/08/1997
please don't feed the Dan, Joe Kelsey, 08/08/1997
watch Moore squirm, D. J. Bernstein, 08/08/1997
please don't feed the Dan, Keith Moore, 08/08/1997
Re: failure to address objections, D. J. Bernstein, 08/07/1997
Re: failure to address objections, Chris Newman, 08/07/1997
failure to address objections, D. J. Bernstein, 08/07/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, D. J. Bernstein, 08/07/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, John C Klensin, 08/07/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Keith Moore, 08/06/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Keith Moore, 08/06/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, Keith Moore, 08/06/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Mark Crispin, 08/06/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/06/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Ned Freed, 08/06/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Ned Freed, 08/06/1997
extensions to local parts of mail addresses, Peter Sylvester, 08/06/1997
Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/06/1997
comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00, Kenzaburou Tamaru (Exchange), 08/06/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 08/05/1997
Re: return-path security, Chris Newman, 08/05/1997
Re: 50 people vs. newman, D. J. Bernstein, 08/05/1997
return-path security, D. J. Bernstein, 08/05/1997
Re: 50 people vs. newman, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 08/05/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/05/1997
Re: 50 people vs. newman, D. J. Bernstein, 08/05/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, Chris Newman, 08/05/1997
Re: MLM subaddress requirement, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/05/1997
MLM subaddress requirement, Chris Newman, 08/05/1997
Re: 50 people vs. newman, Bart Schaefer, 08/05/1997
Re: 50 people vs. newman, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/05/1997
Re: 50 people vs. newman, Harald . T . Alvestrand, 08/05/1997
50 people vs. newman, D. J. Bernstein, 08/05/1997
Re: Innosoft interoperability, D. J. Bernstein, 08/04/1997
Re: Innosoft interoperability, Chris Newman, 08/04/1997
Re: objections, again, D. J. Bernstein, 08/04/1997
Re: objections, again, Chris Newman, 08/04/1997
Re: objections, again, Chris Newman, 08/04/1997
Innosoft interoperability, D. J. Bernstein, 08/04/1997
Re: objections, again, Ned Freed, 08/03/1997
Re: objections, again, Todd Vierling, 08/03/1997
Re: objections, again, D. J. Bernstein, 08/03/1997
Re: finally, an example, D. J. Bernstein, 08/03/1997
Re: finally, an example, Bart Schaefer, 08/03/1997
finally, an example, D. J. Bernstein, 08/03/1997
Re: objections, again, Chris Newman, 08/03/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/03/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/03/1997
objections, again, D. J. Bernstein, 08/03/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/02/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 08/01/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Craig_Everhart, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, John Robert LoVerso, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Craig_Everhart, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/31/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Bart Schaefer, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Rick Troth, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, John C Klensin, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/30/1997
Re: Email Subaddressing, D. J. Bernstein, 07/30/1997
Email Subaddressing, Chris Newman, 07/30/1997
Originator-Info header, Chris Newman, 07/30/1997
I-D ACTION:draft-newman-email-subaddr-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/30/1997
I-D ACTION:draft-newman-msgheader-originfo-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/30/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/18/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/18/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/17/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 07/16/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/16/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/16/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/15/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/15/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/15/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 07/15/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/15/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 07/15/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/14/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/14/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Pete Resnick, 07/14/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 07/14/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 07/14/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/14/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 07/14/1997
Re: Bart's reading comprehension, D. J. Bernstein, 07/10/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 07/10/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, Bart Schaefer, 07/10/1997
Some vendors Just Dont Get It., Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/10/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, D. J. Bernstein, 07/10/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, Bart Schaefer, 07/10/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/10/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, D. J. Bernstein, 07/10/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/10/1997
Re: Bart's reading comprehension, D. J. Bernstein, 07/10/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Jamie Zawinski, 07/10/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/10/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, Bart Schaefer, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/09/1997
Re: Keith's proposal, Johnny Eriksson, 07/09/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/09/1997
Re: Bart's proposal, D. J. Bernstein, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/09/1997
Re: Keith's proposal, D. J. Bernstein, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Craig_Everhart, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Bart Schaefer, 07/09/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/08/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/08/1997
Advise on the implementation of Supersedes, In-Reply-To and References e-mail headers, Jacob Palme, 07/05/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 07/03/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 07/03/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/03/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Chris Newman, 07/03/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 07/02/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 07/02/1997
Re: best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 06/30/1997
Re: best name for followups?, Keith Moore, 06/30/1997
best name for followups?, D. J. Bernstein, 06/29/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Keith Moore, 06/16/1997
RE: Accept-Language: proposal, Jeff Stephenson (Exchange), 06/16/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Ned Freed, 06/16/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Chris Newman, 06/14/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Larry Masinter, 06/13/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Keith Moore, 06/13/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, John Gardiner Myers, 06/13/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06/13/1997
Re: Accept-Language: proposal, Larry Masinter, 06/13/1997
Accept-Language: proposal, John Gardiner Myers, 06/13/1997
Re: URL type, D. J. Bernstein, 04/29/1997
URL type, John Mani, 04/29/1997
MailConnect 2 / 26-27 March 97: Email Interoperability testing, Dave Crocker, 03/05/1997
MailConnect 2 interoperability event, Dave Crocker, 02/21/1997
Re: content-disposition, Keith Moore, 02/19/1997
content-disposition, Larry Masinter, 02/18/1997
The new "ietf-822" mailing list, Paul E. Hoffman, 01/12/1997

Page 13 of 13
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.