Archive of ietf-822, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-822

Page 2 of 13
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Philip Guenther, 05/01/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Charles Lindsey, 05/01/2007
Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard, Philip Guenther, 05/01/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/01/2007
Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard, Frank Ellermann, 04/30/2007
Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard, Pete Resnick, 04/30/2007
Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard, Frank Ellermann, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Frank Ellermann, 04/30/2007
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews, Russ Allbery, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Frank Ellermann, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews, Frank Ellermann, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Dave Crocker, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Pete Resnick, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/30/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Pete Resnick, 04/30/2007
Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard, ned+ietf-822, 04/30/2007
[2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard, Frank Ellermann, 04/29/2007
Re: Compatibility wit Netnews, Frank Ellermann, 04/29/2007
Re: draft-resnick-2822upd-01 posted, Charles Lindsey, 04/27/2007
Compatibility wit Netnews (was I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt), Charles Lindsey, 04/27/2007
Re: draft-resnick-2822upd-01 posted, Pete Resnick, 04/26/2007
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-resnick-2822upd-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 04/26/2007
draft-resnick-2822upd-01 posted, Pete Resnick, 04/26/2007
Re: 2822bis and ""@example.org, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/24/2007
Re: 2822bis and ""@example.org, Bruce Lilly, 04/23/2007
Re: 2822bis and ""@example.org, Frank Ellermann, 03/31/2007
2822bis and ""@example.org, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/28/2007
update to SMTP/RFC2821 about to become available, Tony Hansen, 03/07/2007
Mail System Error - Returned Mail, iesg-secretary, 03/05/2007
[Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email]], Harald Alvestrand, 02/19/2007
Re: XML part and MIME boundary, Francesco Gennai, 02/02/2007
Re: XML part and MIME boundary, Tony Hansen, 02/02/2007
XML part and MIME boundary, Francesco Gennai, 02/02/2007
[Fwd: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work], Tony Hansen, 01/22/2007
IETF-822@xxxxxxx, narten, 01/11/2007
[Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC], Tony Hansen, 01/02/2007
error, phoffman, 11/21/2006
MAIL SYSTEM ERROR - RETURNED MAIL, danny, 11/21/2006
Re: informal last call for draft-duerst-archived-at-06, Graham Klyne, 11/08/2006
Re: informal last call for draft-duerst-archived-at-06, Frank Ellermann, 11/08/2006
Re: informal last call for draft-duerst-archived-at-06, Graham Klyne, 11/08/2006
Re: informal last call for draft-duerst-archived-at-06, Frank Ellermann, 10/27/2006
informal last call for draft-duerst-archived-at-06, Martin Duerst, 10/26/2006
DELIVERY FAILED, iesg-secretary, 10/17/2006
[no subject], ole, 10/16/2006
Test, paf, 10/10/2006
Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 10/10/2006
Delivery reports about your e-mail, richard, 10/05/2006
MESSAGE COULD NOT BE DELIVERED, bwijnen, 09/26/2006
Re: disposition vs. media type, Frank Ellermann, 09/19/2006
disposition vs. media type (Was Re: MIME part header), Bruce Lilly, 09/18/2006
Re: MIME part header, Frank Ellermann, 09/18/2006
Re: MIME part header (was: SMTP headers), Bruce Lilly, 09/17/2006
Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 09/15/2006
Re: MIME part header (was: SMTP headers), Bruce Lilly, 09/14/2006
Re: MIME part header (was: SMTP headers), Philippe de Rochambeau, 09/14/2006
Re: SMTP headers, SM, 09/14/2006
MIME part header (was: SMTP headers), Frank Ellermann, 09/14/2006
SMTP headers, PDeRochambeau, 09/14/2006
4409 to STD, Frank Ellermann, 09/12/2006
Status, ehall, 08/27/2006
Message could not be delivered, chair, 08/27/2006
delivery failed, ken, 08/19/2006
Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 08/16/2006
RE: rfc2231 implementations?, Yuri Inglikov, 08/14/2006
status, raeburn, 08/14/2006
Re: rfc2231 implementations?, Keith Moore, 08/11/2006
RE: rfc2231 implementations?, Bruce Lilly, 08/11/2006
RE: rfc2231 implementations?, Yuri Inglikov, 08/11/2006
[no subject], iesg, 08/08/2006
[no subject], matthias . andree, 08/07/2006
Ovclbygqmrwhvgn, dave, 07/28/2006
IETF-822@xxxxxxx, narten, 07/26/2006
Status, vjs, 07/26/2006
Re: rfc2231 implementations?, Bruce Lilly, 07/24/2006
Ietf-822@xxxxxxx, ehall, 07/24/2006
Ietf-822@xxxxxxx, internet-drafts, 07/24/2006
report, madwolf, 07/22/2006
Re: rfc2231 implementations?, Eric Fischer, 07/19/2006
RE: rfc2231 implementations?, Yuri Inglikov, 07/19/2006
Re: rfc2231 implementations?, Ingo Klöcker, 07/19/2006
Re: rfc2231 implementations?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07/19/2006
Re: rfc2231 implementations?, Ingo Klöcker, 07/19/2006
Re:rfc2231 implementations?, Bowesman Antony, 07/18/2006
rfc2231 implementations?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07/18/2006
Delivery reports about your e-mail, bwijnen, 07/13/2006
Delivery reports about your e-mail, hugo, 06/23/2006
delivery failed, iesg, 06/16/2006
Svnjzhaanotknf, moore, 06/04/2006
[no subject], jerry . weingarten, 06/02/2006
RE: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Philip Hazel, 03/27/2006
RE: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Misha Wolf, 03/27/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Bruce Lilly, 03/26/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Bruce Lilly, 03/26/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, ned+ietf-822, 03/13/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Tony Finch, 03/13/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/13/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, ned+ietf-822, 03/13/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/13/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Martin Duerst, 03/12/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Perry E. Metzger, 03/12/2006
Re: Charset mandatory in unix/linux, ned+ietf-822, 03/12/2006
Charset mandatory in unix/linux, Jacob Palme, 03/12/2006
draft-saintandre-jabberid-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 02/18/2006
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-buxey-document-00.txt, Charles Lindsey, 01/30/2006
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-buxey-document-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 01/26/2006
Re: content-type and name parameter, Peter Koch, 12/13/2005
Re: content-type and name parameter, Frank Ellermann, 12/09/2005
Re: content-type and name parameter, Francesco Gennai, 12/09/2005
Re: content-type and name parameter, ned+ietf-822, 12/09/2005
Re: content-type and name parameter, Ingo Klöcker, 12/09/2005
content-type and name parameter, Francesco Gennai, 12/09/2005
Re: Allowing non-quoted "." and "," in display-name?, ned+ietf-822, 11/30/2005
Allowing non-quoted "." and "," in display-name?, Jacob Palme, 11/30/2005
OT: IMA (IEE BoF) jabber log, Frank Ellermann, 11/10/2005
Re: content-type parameter "reply-type", Dave Crocker, 11/10/2005
content-type parameter "reply-type", Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11/01/2005
draft-duerst-archived-at-04 (was: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-03.txt), Frank Ellermann, 11/01/2005
Re: Off-topic: @, Alan Barrett, 10/11/2005
Re: Off-topic: @, Bruce Lilly, 10/11/2005
Re: Off-topic: @, Laird Breyer, 10/06/2005
Re: Off-topic: @, Laird Breyer, 10/06/2005
Re: Off-topic: @, Frank Ellermann, 10/06/2005
Re: Off-topic: @, Dave Crocker, 10/06/2005
Off-topic: @, Paul Hoffman, 10/06/2005
Re: CFWS: beaten, down, kicked to death, and still being flogged (Was Re: Malformed header - what would you do?), Charles Lindsey, 07/25/2005
Re: 2822 revised grammar, Bruce Lilly, 07/24/2005
Re: 2822 revised grammar, Frank Ellermann, 07/24/2005
Re: 2822 revised grammar, Bruce Lilly, 07/24/2005
Re: 2822 revised grammar, Frank Ellermann, 07/23/2005
Re: 2822 revised grammar, Bruce Lilly, 07/23/2005
Re: 2822 revised grammar, Frank Ellermann, 07/22/2005
2822 revised grammar (Was Re: Malformed header - what would you do?), Bruce Lilly, 07/22/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Frank Ellermann, 07/22/2005
CFWS: beaten, down, kicked to death, and still being flogged (Was Re: Malformed header - what would you do?), Bruce Lilly, 07/22/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Charles Lindsey, 07/22/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Bruce Lilly, 07/21/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Frank Ellermann, 07/21/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Bruce Lilly, 07/21/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Frank Ellermann, 07/21/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Bruce Lilly, 07/20/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Charles Lindsey, 07/20/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Adam M. Costello, 07/20/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Adam M. Costello, 07/20/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Adam M. Costello, 07/19/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 07/19/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Frank Ellermann, 07/19/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 07/19/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Bruce Lilly, 07/19/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Adam M. Costello, 07/17/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Paul Smith, 07/15/2005
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?, Adam M. Costello, 07/15/2005
Malformed header - what would you do?, Paul Smith, 07/14/2005
Re: New internet-Drafts for an extensible Inernet Message Format, Bruce Lilly, 07/12/2005
New internet-Drafts for an extensible Inernet Message Format, Bruce Lilly, 07/12/2005
Re: OPES and Email, John C Klensin, 07/08/2005
Re: OPES and Email, John Leslie, 07/08/2005
Re: OPES and Email, Bruce Lilly, 07/08/2005
Re: OPES and Email, Tony Hansen, 07/07/2005
Re: OPES and Email, Frank Ellermann, 07/07/2005
Re: OPES and Email, SM, 07/07/2005
Re: OPES and Email, Tony Hansen, 07/07/2005
Re: OPES and Email, Matti Aarnio, 07/07/2005
OPES and Email, Tony Hansen, 07/07/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 07/01/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, ned+ietf-822, 07/01/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 07/01/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, ned+ietf-822, 07/01/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Charles Lindsey, 07/01/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Charles Lindsey, 07/01/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Frank Ellermann, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, ned+ietf-822, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, ned+ietf-822, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Charles Lindsey, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Charles Lindsey, 06/30/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/29/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/29/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/29/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Frank Ellermann, 06/28/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/28/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/28/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/28/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/28/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, ned+ietf-822, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, ned+ietf-822, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/27/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Laird Breyer, 06/26/2005
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06/26/2005
gzip/deflate compression/encoding, Bruce Lilly, 06/25/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Keith Moore, 06/10/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 06/10/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Frank Ellermann, 06/09/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Alan Barrett, 06/09/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Keith Moore, 06/09/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Bruce Lilly, 06/09/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Keith Moore, 06/09/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 06/09/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Philip Hazel, 06/08/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Keith Moore, 06/08/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 06/08/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 06/08/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Ian Bell, 06/08/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Hector Santos, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, ned+ietf-822, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, ned+ietf-822, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, ned+ietf-822, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Unhelpful behavior of many MUAs..., Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Keith Moore, 06/07/2005
Re: *Reply-to* considered harmful (was Re: Understanding response protocols), Paul Jakma, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Hector Santos, 06/07/2005
Re: Confusing UAs considered harmful (was *Reply-to* considered harmful), Paul Jakma, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Paul Jakma, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Alan Barrett, 06/07/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Ian Bell, 06/07/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Hector Santos, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Hector Santos, 06/06/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, ned+ietf-822, 06/06/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Hector Santos, 06/06/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06/06/2005
Re: *Reply-to* considered harmful, Frank Ellermann, 06/06/2005
Re: Confusing UAs considered harmful (was *Reply-to* considered harmful), Keith Moore, 06/06/2005
Confusing UAs considered harmful (was *Reply-to* considered harmful), Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
*Reply-to* considered harmful (was Re: Understanding response protocols), Keith Moore, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Bruce Lilly, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Paul Jakma, 06/03/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 06/02/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Paul Jakma, 06/01/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 06/01/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 06/01/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Charles Lindsey, 05/31/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Philip Hazel, 05/31/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/30/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Keith Moore, 05/29/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/28/2005
Re: Understanding response protocols, Paul Jakma, 05/28/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, Bruce Lilly, 05/28/2005
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies, ned+ietf-822, 05/28/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/28/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/28/2005
Folding of long lines in message bodies, Jacob Palme, 05/28/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/28/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/28/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/27/2005
Original-* (was: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt), Frank Ellermann, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, wayne, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, wayne, 05/27/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, william(at)elan.net, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Eric A. Hall, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Eric A. Hall, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, william(at)elan.net, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, ned+ietf-822, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Eric A. Hall, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, william(at)elan.net, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Eric A. Hall, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/27/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Charles Lindsey, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Charles Lindsey, 05/27/2005
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/27/2005
SMTP option for DHCPv6, Cristian Cadar, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/27/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/26/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/26/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/26/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, ned+ietf-822, 05/26/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/26/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bill Fenner, 05/26/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Charles Lindsey, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, ned+ietf-822, 05/25/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Adam M. Costello, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, william(at)elan.net, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Yakov Shafranovich, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, ned+ietf-822, 05/25/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Yakov Shafranovich, 05/25/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/25/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/25/2005
Comments and objections on MARID-related drafts, william(at)elan.net, 05/25/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/25/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Charles Lindsey, 05/25/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/24/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/24/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/24/2005
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Bruce Lilly, 05/24/2005
mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to, Paul Jakma, 05/24/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/23/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/23/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Richard Clayton, 05/23/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Richard Clayton, 05/23/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/23/2005
Re: ABNF experts sought for OpenPGP header definition, Charles Lindsey, 05/23/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 05/22/2005
Re: ABNF experts sought for OpenPGP header definition, Bruce Lilly, 05/21/2005
Re: ABNF experts sought for OpenPGP header definition, Frank Ellermann, 05/21/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/21/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Richard Clayton, 05/20/2005
SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 05/20/2005
Re: ABNF, Dave Crocker, 05/20/2005
ABNF experts sought for OpenPGP header definition, Simon Josefsson, 05/20/2005
Re: ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 05/16/2005
Re: ABNF, Bruce Lilly, 05/16/2005
Re: ABNF, Dave Crocker, 05/16/2005
Re: ABNF, Charles Lindsey, 05/16/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Frank Ellermann, 05/15/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bill Fenner, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bruce Lilly, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bruce Lilly, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Frank Ellermann, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Frank Ellermann, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bruce Lilly, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, william(at)elan.net, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bruce Lilly, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, Bruce Lilly, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, Bruce Lilly, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Frank Ellermann, 05/14/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Frank Ellermann, 05/13/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bruce Lilly, 05/13/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bill Fenner, 05/13/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Frank Ellermann, 05/12/2005
Re: ABNF, Dave Crocker, 05/11/2005
Re: ABNF, ned+ietf-822, 05/11/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Keith Moore, 05/11/2005
Re: ABNF, and miscellany, Bruce Lilly, 05/11/2005
Re: ABNF, Bruce Lilly, 05/11/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, ned+ietf-822, 05/11/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Keith Moore, 05/11/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/11/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Bill Fenner, 05/10/2005
Review draft-leibzon-content-author-originator-00.txt, william(at)elan.net, 05/10/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/10/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/10/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/09/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/09/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05/09/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-legacy-fields-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 04/22/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-legacy-fields-00.txt, Keith Moore, 04/21/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-legacy-fields-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 04/21/2005
Re: Addressing "Out of office" Vacation accounts, Keith Moore, 04/15/2005
Re: Addressing "Out of office" Vacation accounts, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/15/2005
Addressing "Out of office" Vacation accounts, Hector Santos, 04/14/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Frank Ellermann, 04/08/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Keith Moore, 04/08/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Arun Sankar, 04/08/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Keith Moore, 04/07/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 04/07/2005
Re: Message with no From at all (6), Charles Lindsey, 04/01/2005
Re: Message with no From at all (6), Charles Lindsey, 03/28/2005
Re: Message with no From at all (6), Frank Ellermann, 03/25/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Charles Lindsey, 03/23/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Charles Lindsey, 03/23/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Bruce Lilly, 03/22/2005
Test without From (4), Charles Lindsey, 03/22/2005
Test with From <> (4), Charles Lindsey, 03/22/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), ned+ietf-822, 03/22/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Charles Lindsey, 03/22/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Frank Ellermann, 03/22/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Bart Schaefer, 03/21/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Simon Josefsson, 03/21/2005
Re: Test with From <> (3), Tony Finch, 03/21/2005
Re: another test message with from:<> (not this message), Charles Lindsey, 03/21/2005
Test with From <> (3), Charles Lindsey, 03/21/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/21/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Frank Ellermann, 03/21/2005
Re: Test message without From, Tony Finch, 03/18/2005
Re: another test message with from:<> (not this message), Frank Ellermann, 03/17/2005
Re: Test message without From, Charles Lindsey, 03/17/2005
Re: another test message with from:<> (not this message), Charles Lindsey, 03/17/2005
Re: Test message without From, Paul Smith, 03/17/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/16/2005
Re: Test message without From, Tony Hansen, 03/16/2005
another test message with from:<> (not this message), Keith Moore, 03/16/2005
Re: Test message without From (was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt), Bart Schaefer, 03/16/2005
Re: Test message without From, Bart Schaefer, 03/16/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/16/2005
Test message without From (was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt), Frank Ellermann, 03/16/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Frank Ellermann, 03/16/2005
Re: Test message without From, ned+ietf-822, 03/16/2005
Test message without From, Tony Finch, 03/16/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Charles Lindsey, 03/16/2005
Test message without From, chl, 03/16/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Charles Lindsey, 03/16/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/15/2005
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Keith Moore, 03/15/2005
Message with From: <> (6), Charles Lindsey, 03/15/2005
Message with no From at all (6), postmaster, 03/15/2005
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-from-optional-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/15/2005
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-field-specification-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/15/2005
RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Dave Crocker, 03/08/2005
RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Scott Hollenbeck, 03/08/2005
RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Bruce Lilly, 03/08/2005
RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03/08/2005
RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Scott Hollenbeck, 03/08/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Tony Hansen, 03/08/2005
Re: Update to "simplified" RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 03/07/2005
Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Bruce Lilly, 03/07/2005
Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03/07/2005
Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Bill Fenner, 03/07/2005
Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03/07/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 03/07/2005
Re: Update to "simplified" RFC 2822 grammar, Dave Crocker, 03/07/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Bruce Lilly, 03/07/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 03/07/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Charles Lindsey, 03/07/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 03/06/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Bruce Lilly, 03/06/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Tony Finch, 03/06/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/06/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/06/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 03/04/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/03/2005
(no subject), Z. Rahman, 03/03/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 03/02/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/02/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 03/02/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 03/02/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Bruce Lilly, 03/02/2005
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 03/02/2005
Update to "simplified" RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 03/02/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Charles Lindsey, 03/02/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 03/01/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/01/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/01/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Bruce Lilly, 03/01/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Frank Ellermann, 03/01/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Hector Santos, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Frank Ellermann, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Frank Ellermann, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Frank Ellermann, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Frank Ellermann, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Frank Ellermann, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Site policy vs. HELO, Vince Sabio, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-03.txt, Keith Moore, 02/28/2005
Re: MTS transparency and anonymity, Tony Finch, 02/28/2005

Page 2 of 13
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.