Archive of ietf-822, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-822

Page 5 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/06/2004
Re: reply options, Keith Moore, 09/06/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/06/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/06/2004
Re: References, In-Reply-To, and Resent-Message-ID: responses and message fragmentation/reassembly, Russ Allbery, 09/06/2004
Re: reply options, Alan Barrett, 09/06/2004
reply options, Keith Moore, 09/06/2004
References, In-Reply-To, and Resent-Message-ID: responses and message fragmentation/reassembly, Bruce Lilly, 09/06/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Alan Barrett, 09/06/2004
draft-crocker-email-arch, Dave Crocker, 09/05/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/05/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Claus Färber, 09/05/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/05/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Kai Henningsen, 09/05/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/04/2004
Re: reply problem list, Philip Hazel, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], D. J. Bernstein, 09/04/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/04/2004
Re: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Simon Josefsson, 09/04/2004
RE: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Jacob Palme, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], D. J. Bernstein, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/03/2004
Re: reply problem list, Keith Moore, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 09/03/2004
Re: Mail agents and definitions (Was Re: The Bcc Issue), Cyrus Daboo, 09/03/2004
RE: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Nick Ing-Simmons, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/03/2004
Mail agents and definitions (Was Re: The Bcc Issue), Bruce Lilly, 09/03/2004
RE: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Jacob Palme, 09/03/2004
Re: reply problem list, Philip Hazel, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 09/03/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/02/2004
RE: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, ned+ietf-822, 09/02/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 09/02/2004
Re: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Keith Moore, 09/02/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Randall Gellens, 09/02/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Randall Gellens, 09/02/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Martin Duerst, 09/02/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 09/02/2004
RE: Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 09/02/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 09/02/2004
Re: reply problem list, Keith Moore, 09/02/2004
Erroneous content-type: Text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Jacob Palme, 09/02/2004
Re: reply problem list, Philip Hazel, 09/02/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/01/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 09/01/2004
Re: reply problem list, Bruce Lilly, 09/01/2004
Re: reply problem list, Simon Josefsson, 09/01/2004
Re: reply problem list, Bruce Lilly, 09/01/2004
3rd party ietf-compliance testers, Tony Hansen, 09/01/2004
Re: reply problem list, Keith Moore, 09/01/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 09/01/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 09/01/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Charles Lindsey, 09/01/2004
Re: reply problem list, D. J. Bernstein, 09/01/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Claus Färber, 09/01/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 08/31/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 08/31/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/31/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/31/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 08/31/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Charles Lindsey, 08/31/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/31/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/31/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, ned+ietf-822, 08/30/2004
Re: reply problem list, Bruce Lilly, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bruce Lilly, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bill McQuillan, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 08/30/2004
reply problem list, Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 08/30/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Bruce Lilly, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Simon Josefsson, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 08/30/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 08/30/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nick Ing-Simmons, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Simon Josefsson, 08/30/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 08/29/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Keith Moore, 08/29/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein, 08/29/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Laird Breyer, 08/29/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Eric Fischer, 08/29/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/29/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/29/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/29/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Bruce Lilly, 08/29/2004
Re: the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, Bruce Lilly, 08/29/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, D. J. Bernstein, 08/29/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 08/29/2004
the most obvious failure in To-NoReply, D. J. Bernstein, 08/29/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein, 08/29/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Tony Hansen, 08/29/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 08/29/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08/29/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/29/2004
internationalization of mail, Bruce Lilly, 08/28/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/28/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/28/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Nick Ing-Simmons, 08/28/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Tony Hansen, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Laird Breyer, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, ned+ietf-822, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Steve Dorner, 08/27/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Russ Allbery, 08/27/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/27/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, ned+ietf-822, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Steve Dorner, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08/27/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Bruce Lilly, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/27/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Laird Breyer, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Laird Breyer, 08/27/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Katsuhiko Momoi, 08/27/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Bill McQuillan, 08/27/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Nick Ing-Simmons, 08/27/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Philip Hazel, 08/27/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Katsuhiko Momoi, 08/26/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 08/26/2004
Re: internationalization of mail, Katsuhiko Momoi, 08/26/2004
internationalization of mail, Tex Texin, 08/26/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, John C Klensin, 08/26/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Steve Dorner, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/26/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/26/2004
Re: draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, Simon Josefsson, 08/26/2004
draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00, John C Klensin, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Charles Lindsey, 08/26/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/26/2004
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Simon Josefsson, 08/26/2004
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt], Keith Moore, 08/25/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/25/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/25/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Laird Breyer, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/24/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/23/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/23/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Kai Henningsen, 08/22/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 08/21/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 08/21/2004
[Fwd: MSAs (RFC 2476), RFC 2822, and the Date field], Bruce Lilly, 08/21/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, ned+ietf-822, 08/21/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/19/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Bill McQuillan, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nick Ing-Simmons, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/18/2004
how to handle microsoft OLE messages?, Venkat Ramisetty, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Bruce Lilly, 08/18/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 08/18/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 08/18/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 08/17/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Kai Henningsen, 08/17/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Kai Henningsen, 08/17/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Kai Henningsen, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/17/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 08/16/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Laird Breyer, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Keith Moore, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Claus Färber, 08/16/2004
Re: Disabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 08/16/2004
Disabling Replies, Bruce Lilly, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 08/16/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Tony Hansen, 08/16/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 08/16/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Tony Hansen, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Dave Crocker, 08/16/2004
Re: Diabling Replies, Tony Hansen, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Tony Hansen, 08/16/2004
Re: Message-ID and Bcc Was: The Bcc Issue, Bruce Lilly, 08/16/2004
Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly, 08/16/2004
Diabling Replies, Dave Crocker, 08/16/2004
The job of an MSA, Dave Crocker, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 08/16/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08/16/2004
To and CC without reply (was: the Bcc issue), Keith Moore, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Charles Lindsey, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Charles Lindsey, 08/16/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/16/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/16/2004
Message-ID and Bcc Was: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Jacob Palme, 08/16/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/15/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Laird Breyer, 08/15/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08/15/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/15/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 08/15/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/15/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz, 08/14/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Bruce Lilly, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Dave Crocker, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Tony Hansen, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, ned+ietf-822, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-822, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08/13/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/13/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 08/13/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/13/2004
Re: The Bcc Issue, Keith Moore, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/13/2004
The Bcc Issue, Philip Hazel, 08/13/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/13/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/13/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 08/12/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Eric A. Hall, 08/12/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen, 08/12/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/12/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/12/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/12/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Kai Henningsen, 08/12/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/12/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08/12/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/12/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/12/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Charles Lindsey, 08/12/2004
Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, Bruce Lilly, 08/11/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/11/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/11/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/10/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/10/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/10/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/10/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/10/2004
Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard, The IESG, 08/09/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/06/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/06/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/06/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/06/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/06/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/06/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 08/06/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/05/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/05/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Bruce Lilly, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Nick Ing-Simmons, 08/05/2004
Re: RFC validation samples?, Keith Moore, 08/05/2004
RFC validation samples?, Laird Breyer, 08/04/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 08/02/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/02/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/02/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 08/02/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 08/01/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/31/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/31/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/31/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/31/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 07/30/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 07/30/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Kai Henningsen, 07/30/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 07/29/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Tony Hansen, 07/29/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/29/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/29/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/29/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/29/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/26/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 07/25/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/25/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Keith Moore, 07/25/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Kai Henningsen, 07/25/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/24/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 07/24/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Bruce Lilly, 07/23/2004
RE: Has IANA gone mad?, Scott Hollenbeck, 07/23/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 07/23/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/23/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Bruce Lilly, 07/23/2004
RE: Has IANA gone mad?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 07/20/2004
RE: Has IANA gone mad?, Scott Hollenbeck, 07/20/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 07/20/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 07/19/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Bruce Lilly, 07/19/2004
RE: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 07/19/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., ned+ietf-822, 07/19/2004
Re: Email archiving (was: New Content-Disposition...), Keith Moore, 07/19/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Keith Moore, 07/19/2004
Email archiving (was: New Content-Disposition...), Graham Klyne, 07/19/2004
RE: Has IANA gone mad?, Scott Hollenbeck, 07/18/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 07/18/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Bruce Lilly, 07/18/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Russ Allbery, 07/18/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, ned+ietf-822, 07/18/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Bruce Lilly, 07/18/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Bruce Lilly, 07/18/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07/18/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Keith Moore, 07/18/2004
Re: Has IANA gone mad?, Tony Hansen, 07/17/2004
RE: Has IANA gone mad?, Scott Hollenbeck, 07/17/2004
Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/17/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Bruce Lilly, 07/17/2004
Has IANA gone mad?, Bruce Lilly, 07/17/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., ned+ietf-822, 07/16/2004
Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 07/15/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Graham Klyne, 07/07/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Keith Moore, 07/06/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Bruce Lilly, 07/06/2004
Re: Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Keith Moore, 07/06/2004
Suggestion : New Content-Disposition parameters..., Tanu Mutreja, 07/06/2004
Re: content-type: text/plain; magic=on; magic=off, Hector Santos, 06/11/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Bruce Lilly, 05/29/2004
Re: content-type: text/plain; magic=on; magic=off, ned+ietf-822, 05/28/2004
Re: content-type: text/plain; magic=on; magic=off, Keith Moore, 05/28/2004
content-type: text/plain; magic=on; magic=off, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/28/2004
Re: Last Call: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, ned+ietf-822, 05/27/2004
Re: Last Call: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Dave Crocker, 05/26/2004
Re: Last Call: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Dave Crocker, 05/25/2004
Re: Last Call: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Graham Klyne, 05/25/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Charles Lindsey, 05/21/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Graham Klyne, 05/17/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Charles Lindsey, 05/14/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Keith Moore, 05/12/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Charles Lindsey, 05/12/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Graham Klyne, 05/07/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Graham Klyne, 05/07/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Charles Lindsey, 05/03/2004
Re: More on mail message header fields, Keith Moore, 04/30/2004
More on mail message header fields, Graham Klyne, 04/30/2004
Re: draft-klyne-hdrreg-mail-04, Graham Klyne, 04/26/2004
Best practice headers, Sean Donelan, 04/25/2004
draft-klyne-hdrreg-mail-04, Graham Klyne, 04/23/2004
Re: Mail/MIME permanent header registrations, ned+ietf-822, 04/17/2004
Mail/MIME permanent header registrations, Graham Klyne, 04/16/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Graham Klyne, 04/13/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Charles Lindsey, 04/08/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Jacob Palme, 04/08/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Graham Klyne, 04/07/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Keith Moore, 04/07/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Keith Moore, 04/07/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Graham Klyne, 04/07/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Charles Lindsey, 04/07/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, ned+ietf-822, 04/06/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Graham Klyne, 04/06/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, ned+ietf-822, 04/06/2004
Re: Is Accept-language an email header field?, Keith Moore, 04/06/2004
Is Accept-language an email header field?, Graham Klyne, 04/06/2004
Re: =?utf-8*la*?q?Re:_?= Re: Sv: Ant: Sv: Re:, Charles Lindsey, 03/31/2004
Re: =?utf-8*la*?q?Re:_?= Re: Sv: Ant: Sv: Re:, Charles Lindsey, 03/31/2004
SMTP implementations omitting Seconds in the Received time-stamp, Philip Miller, 03/29/2004
Re: why spamassassin sucks, Keith Moore, 03/29/2004
why spamassassin sucks, Keith Moore, 03/29/2004
Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Charles Lindsey, 03/17/2004
Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Jacob Palme, 03/16/2004
Re: Microsoft Patent - Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 03/12/2004
Re: Microsoft Patent - Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 03/11/2004
Re: Microsoft Patent - Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Nick Shelness, 03/11/2004
Re: Microsoft Patent - Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Tim Kehres, 03/11/2004
Re: Microsoft Patent - Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Nathaniel Borenstein, 03/11/2004
Microsoft Patent - Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Hector Santos, 03/10/2004
X- fields (Re: Getting 2822 to Draft), Bruce Lilly, 02/26/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/26/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/26/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Adam M. Costello, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Charles Lindsey, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Charles Lindsey, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/24/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/24/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Adam M. Costello, 02/24/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Martin Duerst, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Martin Duerst, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Charles Lindsey, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Charles Lindsey, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Adam M. Costello, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Keith Moore, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 02/23/2004
Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt, Adam M. Costello, 02/22/2004

Page 5 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.