Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-moore-mail-nr-fields-00.txt]

[Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> >(a) Reply-To with some magic address that is valid syntax but a
> >no-op. maybe this:
> 
> >Reply-To: nobody :;
> 
> But in the case of mailing lists, which is where this requirement most
> often arises, that might also prevent replies being sent to the
> mailing list (except in MUAs that had an explicit command for
> "Reply-To-List").

not if the list were on the To or CC line and the recipient did a "reply
to all".  (I'm assuming that reply-to: nobody:; would just remove the
>From addresses from the reply recipient list, and have no effect on the
addresses obtained from the To and CC fields of the subject message).

Keith