Re: a header authentication scheme

[Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:23:38 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen
<arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> (In a different message, someone mentioned that there's no reason to
> allow such processing before the last hop. [...])

I didn't say there's no reason to allow the processing.  I said
there's no reason for the end recipient to believe the Processed:
header, whether or not said header appears to be tied to a Received:
line, except on the last hop.