[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6

To: ietf-822@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 18:03:16 +0200
Cc: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@xxxxxxxxx>, Cristian Cadar <Cristian.Cadar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "william(at)elan.net" <william@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-822/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-822.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxx

william(at)elan.net writes:

SMTP option for DHCP may not be entirely useful but SUBMIT option for DHCP sure sounds to me like something quite useful and network-topology dependent in many instances.

How would a MUA know whether to use it or not?

If I'm a consultant, then the MUA should use the SUBMIT option when I'm in my own office, but not when I'm at a client site, right? Otherwise I risk getting the SPF/whatever problems I described this morning.

Arnt

References:
- SMTP option for DHCPv6
  - From: Cristian Cadar
- Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
  - From: Eric A. Hall
- Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
  - From: william(at)elan.net

Prev by Date: Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Next by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Previous by thread: Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Next by thread: Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread