Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15

["Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keith Moore wrote:

> How about this: "The sender believes this message will be irrelevant 
> after the indicated date/time."
 
> "This field is primarily intended for use between senders and recipients 
> and their agents, rather than by message transport.    It is suggested 
> that the default behavior of an MUA with respect to the expires header 
> field should be to display such a message in a distinguished way.  For 
> example, the message could be displayed with gray text rather than 
> black, or in a different font than normal, or (in summaries) with an 
> image of an hourglass with the sand at the bottom."
 
> "It is also suggested that MUAs allow setting of an expiration date as 
> an option when composing messages"
 
> "MUAs, Message Stores, and MTAs, MUST NOT delete a message on the basis 
> of an Expired header field unless given explicit instructions to do so 
> by the recipient."
 
> "Mail Filters MUST NOT consider an expired header field as criteria to 
> be considered for deleting the message unless given explicit 
> instructions to do so by the recipient"

+1 (or rather +5)
 
> behavior for mail-to-NetNews gateways should also be specified.

Transparent, "Expires:" can be kept as is (modulo magic SP in news)

 Frank