[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intent to revive "expires" header fromdraft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15

To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Intent to revive "expires" header fromdraft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
From: ned+ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf-822@xxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1217280981; h=Date: From:Subject:MIME-version:Content-type; b=WVZgvvaSR6tYwZDqihfyo12mS FjXy49dLV83zwAVt1Q4N0ttCOPESYW3CoIWACZlxajmssK6yzM3FZXAwpAxdQ==
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:26:49 +0200" <g6kksu$itv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-822/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-822.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <1216718106.6052.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <104713470.20080723101938@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <488705E4.8050905@xxxxxxxxxx> <g673pm$bho$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48871E63.9080401@xxxxxxxxxx> <48888615.4000807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4888ADE8.2040201@xxxxxxx> <1278686337.20080724114039@xxxxxxxxx> <01MXKDNEKS2I00007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <488A07FF.5000001@xxxxxxxxxx> <01MXKITL3CIE00007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <488A5BED.8050408@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <488B8DC1.7030601@xxxxxxxxxx> <> <488CB1FD.9000903@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1217248445.3805.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <g6kksu$itv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxx


> Michael Welzl wrote:
 
> > So, when we weigh the pro's against the con's, is it worth
> > changing the name to "Relevant-until"? I'm not sure...

> Reviving "Expires" is already a long shot, renaming it is a
> waste of everybody's time.  I just checked usefor-usepro-09,
> it doesn't even mention "Expires".  Rumours that Netnews is
> wildly incompatible with your idea are slightly exaggerated,
> no reason to rename this beast to "Display-Grey-After"... :-)

+1

				Ned

References:
- Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Michael Welzl
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Chris Haynes
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Paul Smith
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Paul Smith
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Chris Eastlund
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Bill McQuillan
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: ned+ietf-822
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Paul Smith
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: ned+ietf-822
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Hector Santos
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Paul Smith
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Hector Santos
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Michael Welzl
- Re: Intent to revive "expires" header fromdraft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
  - From: Frank Ellermann

Prev by Date: Re[2]: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
Previous by thread: Re: Intent to revive "expires" header fromdraft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
Next by thread: Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread