Archive of ietf-822, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-822
Page 13 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Updated Format=Flowed Draft,
Randall Gellens
- draft-gellens-format-01 and qp generation,
Ian Bell
- text/*,
Ashley Yakeley
- Re: UTF-7 sucks,
Ashley Yakeley
- Format=Flowed and Non-ASCII Characters,
Ashley Yakeley
- The Passing of Dr. Jon Postel,
Allen Gwinn
- Text,
Ashley Yakeley
- Worldwide,
xjtwgops
- Proper way to specify "Do Not Reply"?,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- utf-8 vs Base64 in LZJU90 and FS,
Al Costanzo
- draft-gellens-format-00.txt,
Clive D.W. Feather
- Mime type statistics,
Jacob Palme
- MIME messages without MIME-Version header,
John Mani
- Re: LZJU90 compression example(s),
Al Costanzo
- Re: application/fs vs. fs/*,
Al Costanzo
- C-T-E compression,
Al Costanzo
- Transport Level Compression?,
Al Costanzo
- The MIME version number,
Al Costanzo
- Re: Transfer Encoding for MIME,
Al Costanzo
- New I-D Transfer Encoding for MIME,
Al Costanzo
- New mailing list for discussing mail header registry,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- draft-gellens-format-00,
Ian Bell
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Randall Gellens
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Ian Bell
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Ned Freed
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Ian Bell
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Ian Bell
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Ned Freed
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Randall Gellens
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Ian Bell
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Chris Newman
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Randall Gellens
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Randall Gellens
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Randall Gellens
- format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Keith Moore
- RE: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Michael A Quinlan
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- why not use *ML (was: format=flowed : why not use HTML?),
Daniel Glazman
- Re: why not use *ML (was: format=flowed : why not use HTML?),
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Ned Freed
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Chris Newman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Keith Moore
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Daniel Glazman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Chris Newman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Keith Moore
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Keith Moore
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Ned Freed
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
John W. Noerenberg
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Randall Gellens
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Keith Moore
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Ned Freed
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Chris Newman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Keith Moore
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Randall Gellens
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Randall Gellens
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Ned Freed
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Chris Newman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Randall Gellens
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Chris Newman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Rick Troth
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Randall Gellens
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Daniel Glazman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Chris Newman
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Jamie Zawinski
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Steve Dorner
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Evan Kirshenbaum
- Re: format=flowed : why not use HTML?,
Rick Troth
- Standard for quoting in plain-text messages.,
Jacob Palme
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Laurence Lundblade
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-gellens-format-00,
Rick Troth
- Re: 8BITMIME to 7BIT,
Pete Resnick
- survey results,
Keith Moore
- test of your mailer's ability to reply to RFC 2047,
Keith Mööre
- implementation of RFC 2047 encoded-words in reply,
Keith Moore
- RFC 822 reference pages available,
D. J. Bernstein
- SAVE CHILDREN'S LIVES,
ep86
- Hot Quick & Easy Money Maker!!!!!!!,
h8dr
- This is text/plain format=paragraphs - how does reply work?,
Laurence Lundblade
- BEANIE BABY LOVERS!!,
xw0q
- This is text/plain wrap=yes - how does it look?,
Laurence Lundblade
- Some notes about the wrap=yes/no or Text/Paragraph issue,
Jacob Palme
- draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd-06.txt: TURN,
Dan Wing
- draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd-06.txt,
Dan Wing
- [no subject],
drle
- Offroad 151 drives anywhere - even underwater!,
qwaf
- MIME torture test,
John Mani
- RE: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Larry Osterman (Exchange)
Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?),
Laurence Lundblade
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?),
Michael A Quinlan
- Re: Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?),
Ned Freed
- Re: Summary (This is text/paragraph - how does it look?),
Steve Dorner
- text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Chris Newman
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Steve Dorner
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Chris Newman
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Steve Dorner
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Ned Freed
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Steve Dorner
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Ned Freed
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Steve Dorner
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Pete Resnick
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Ned Freed
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Pete Resnick
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Bart Schaefer
- Re: text/paragraph or wrap=yes/no,
Ned Freed
RE: overdefining text/plain?,
Dan Kohn
This is text/paragraph - how does it look?,
Laurence Lundblade
Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Ian Bell
- Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
ruth moulton
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Jacob Palme
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Rick Troth
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Chris Newman
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Ian Bell
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Ian Bell
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Jacob Palme
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Rick Troth
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Steve Dorner
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal),
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal),
Ned Freed
- Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal),
Jacob Palme
- Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal),
Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal),
Ned Freed
- Re: Quoting (was Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Chris Newman
- overdefining text/plain?,
Steve Dorner
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Chris Newman
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Steve Dorner
- text/paragraph summary,
Chris Newman
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Jacob Palme
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Chris Newman
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Steve Dorner
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Ned Freed
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Rick Troth
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Laurence Lundblade
- Re: text/paragraph summary,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Steve Dorner
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Steve Dorner
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Chris Newman
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Bill Janssen
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Bill Janssen
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Bill Janssen
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Steve Dorner
- Message not available
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Chris Newman
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Ned Freed
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Keith Moore
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Erik Huizer
- Re: overdefining text/plain?,
Erik Huizer
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Dan Wing
Re: Content-Type: text/paragraph. An alternative proposal,
Dan Wing
Do You Like New Inventions?,
rkoa
Lasers/Optics/Optical Tables - Save!,
9LnhH0281
Let Us Do Your Bulk Emailing Advertising !!!,
fyrlxbz0N
mail to fax,
ruth moulton
redirected mail,
Gerardo Ocampo
rfc 2119 violation,
D. J. Bernstein
watch Moore squirm,
D. J. Bernstein
please don't feed the Dan,
Keith Moore
failure to address objections,
D. J. Bernstein
Re: MLM subaddress requirement,
D. J. Bernstein
extensions to local parts of mail addresses,
Peter Sylvester
comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00,
Kenzaburou Tamaru (Exchange)
return-path security,
D. J. Bernstein
50 people vs. newman,
D. J. Bernstein
Innosoft interoperability,
D. J. Bernstein
finally, an example,
D. J. Bernstein
objections, again,
D. J. Bernstein
Email Subaddressing,
Chris Newman
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
Bart Schaefer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Email Subaddressing,
D. J. Bernstein
Originator-Info header,
Chris Newman
I-D ACTION:draft-newman-email-subaddr-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
I-D ACTION:draft-newman-msgheader-originfo-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Some vendors Just Dont Get It.,
Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Bart's reading comprehension,
D. J. Bernstein
Re: Bart's proposal,
D. J. Bernstein
Re: Keith's proposal,
D. J. Bernstein
Advise on the implementation of Supersedes, In-Reply-To and References e-mail headers,
Jacob Palme
best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
Keith Moore
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
Bart Schaefer
- Re: best name for followups?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: best name for followups?,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
Page 13 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.