Archive of ietf-822, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-822
Page 8 of 13
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Usefor repoll justified? (was Re: Call for Usefor to rec,
Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Usefor repoll justified? (was Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Barr
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Jean-Marc Desperrier
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dan Kohn
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dan Kohn
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Erland Sommarskog
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Erland Sommarskog
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Russ Allbery
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
David Barr
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
David Barr
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Russ Allbery
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
David Barr
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Russ Allbery
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Claus Färber
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Why we're in this mess,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
Keith Moore
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why we're in this mess,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Henry Spencer
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Henry Spencer
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bart Schaefer
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
ned+ietf-822
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Charles Lindsey
- Message not available
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Russ Allbery
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Claus Färber
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Claus Färber
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Russ Allbery
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
David Barr
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Russ Allbery
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Seth Breidbart
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Keith Moore
- What's in a "name"? (Was Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: What's in a "name"? (Was Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)),
Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: What's in a "name"? (Was Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)),
Henry Spencer
- Re: What's in a "name"?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: What's in a "name"?,
Henry Spencer
- Re: What's in a "name"?,
Andrew Gierth
- Re: What's in a "name"?,
Adam M. Costello
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dave Crocker
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
D. J. Bernstein
- RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter),
Dan Kohn
re: running code (was: rfc 2047 and gatewaying),
Keith Moore
Call for Usefor to recharter,
Dan Kohn
Domains to try in double bounce processing.,
Leo Bicknell
RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Andrew Gierth
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Andrew Gierth
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Claus Färber
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Nick Shelness
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Claus Färber
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Claus Färber
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Andrew Gierth
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Tony Hansen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Pete Resnick
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Running code (Was: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Pete Resnick
- Message not available
- Re: Running code (Was: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Andrew Gierth
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Andrew Gierth
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Andrew Gierth
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Andrew Gierth
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)),
Andrew Gierth
- Re: Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)),
Philip Hazel
- Re: Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Jacob Palme
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- [OT] mUTF-7 in IMAP,
Marc Mutz
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Sam Roberts
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- old format date fields (was Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Keith Moore
- Re: old format date fields (was Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: old format date fields (was Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying),
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dan Kohn
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- prevervation of installed base,
Dave Crocker
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Dave Crocker
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Andrew Gierth
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Russ Allbery
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Keld Jørn Simonsen
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: prevervation of installed base,
Charles Lindsey
RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dan Kohn
RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dan Kohn
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Leo Bicknell
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dave Crocker
RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Dan Kohn
Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying,
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
The sad state of MIME non-compliance,
Bruce Lilly
eMail address variation contra mail-spam - thanks for the replies....,
Juergen Helbing
Newbie question: eMail address variation contra mail-spam ?,
Juergen Helbing
RFC2231 encoding in parameters.,
Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Graham Klyne
RE: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Dan Kohn
Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Jacob Palme
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Message not available
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Tony Hansen
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Keith Moore
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Jacob Palme
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Keith Moore
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Keith Moore
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Tony Hansen
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Keith Moore
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Keith Moore
- Message not available
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Keith Moore
- Re: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Charles Lindsey
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: Problem with MIME and line length in Subject headers,
Dan Kohn
Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Jacob Palme
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: Registration procedures for message header fields to BCP,
Graham Klyne
Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Alan Barrett
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Alan Barrett
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Alan Barrett
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Alan Barrett
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Keith Moore
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Philip Hazel
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Alan Barrett
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Marc Mutz
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Interpretation of RFC 2047,
Bart Schaefer
how to exchange EPP content using SMTP transport,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[no subject],
Charles Lindsey
empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Russ Allbery
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Gary Feldman
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Gary Feldman
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Gary Feldman
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Jacob Palme
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Gary Feldman
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Jacob Palme
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Jacob Palme
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
ned+ietf-822
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Bruce Campbell
- Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities,
Keith Moore
radical suggestion,
Keith Moore
Page 8 of 13
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.