Archive of ietf-822, by thread

• Re: Upgrading to UTF-8, (continued)
  • Re: Upgrading to UTF-8, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Upgrading to UTF-8, Charles Lindsey
  • Re: Upgrading to UTF-8, Keith Moore
  • Re: Upgrading to UTF-8, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: Upgrading to UTF-8, Bruce Lilly
  • Re: ietf-822 Non-sub: Re (fwd), Charles Lindsey
    • Re: ietf-822 Non-sub: Re (fwd), Keith Moore
• Problems with all lowercase header field names?, Graham Klyne
  • Re: Problems with all lowercase header field names?, Tony Hansen
  • Re: Problems with all lowercase header field names?, Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Problems with all lowercase header field names?, ned+ietf-822
  • Re: Problems with all lowercase header field names?, Keith Moore
  • Re: Problems with all lowercase header field names?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Thanks (was: Problems with all lowercase header field names?), Graham Klyne
• New draft on internationalizing email addresses, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• FW: I-D ACTION:draft-kohn-news-article-00.txt, Dan Kohn
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-kohn-news-article-00.txt, David Barr
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kohn-news-article-00.txt, Russ Allbery
      • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-kohn-news-article-00.txt, David Barr
    • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-kohn-news-article-00.txt, Henry Spencer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-kohn-news-article-00.txt, Bruce Lilly
• Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
  • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Henry Spencer
    • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Henry Spencer
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Keith Moore
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Keith Moore
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, ned+ietf-822
  • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
    • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Sam Roberts
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Sam Roberts
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Bruce Lilly
      • Review of the UTF-8 transition, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: Transformation of Non-ASCII headers, D. J. Bernstein
• XML format for email and other messages, Graham Klyne
• Language Tagging within Unicode, Charles Lindsey
  • Re: Language Tagging within Unicode, Charles Lindsey
  • Re: Language Tagging within Unicode, Bruce Lilly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Language Tagging within Unicode, Martin Duerst
    • Re: Language Tagging within Unicode, Charles Lindsey
• RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
  • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Keith Moore
    • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Marc Mutz
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Claus Färber
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Claus Färber
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2231 and CFWS, Bruce Lilly
• RE: For shame (Was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), David Barr
• distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Keith Moore
  • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Dave Crocker
    • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Keith Moore
      • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Dave Crocker
      • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Keith Moore
  • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, ned+ietf-822
  • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Keith Moore
      • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Keith Moore
      • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Charles Lindsey
    • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Claus Färber
  • Re: distinguishing between utf-8 and gb18030, Charles Lindsey
• rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Keith Moore
  • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Charles Lindsey
    • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Keith Moore
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Russ Allbery
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Charles Lindsey
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Russ Allbery
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Keith Moore
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Russ Allbery
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Adam M. Costello
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Andrew Gierth
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Claus Färber
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Russ Allbery
      • Re: rather than argue and bicker about who said what..., Andrew Gierth
• Historical trivia, Bruce Lilly
  • Re: Historical trivia, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Historical trivia, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Historical trivia, Nick Shelness
      • Re: Historical trivia, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: Historical trivia, Nick Shelness
• Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Jean-Marc Desperrier
  • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly
    • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Henry Spencer
    • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Brett Kottmann
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Alan Barrett
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly
      • ``ASCII-compatible'' does not mean ``7-bit'', D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: ``ASCII-compatible'' does not mean ``7-bit'', Keith Moore
      • Re: ``ASCII-compatible'' does not mean ``7-bit'', Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly
• RE: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Dan Kohn
• Usefor repoll justified? (was Re: Call for Usefor to rec, Forrest J. Cavalier III
• Re: Usefor repoll justified? (was Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Barr
• Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
  • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier
    • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dan Kohn
  • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dan Kohn
  • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Erland Sommarskog
    • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Erland Sommarskog
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Russ Allbery
      • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), David Barr
      • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), David Barr
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), David Barr
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Claus Färber
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Why we're in this mess, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, Keith Moore
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Why we're in this mess, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Henry Spencer
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Henry Spencer
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bart Schaefer
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), ned+ietf-822
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Message not available
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Claus Färber
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Claus Färber
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Russ Allbery
      • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), David Barr
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Russ Allbery
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Seth Breidbart
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • What's in a "name"? (Was Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: What's in a "name"? (Was Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)), Jean-Marc Desperrier
      • Re: What's in a "name"? (Was Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)), Henry Spencer
      • Re: What's in a "name"?, Russ Allbery
      • Re: What's in a "name"?, Henry Spencer
      • Re: What's in a "name"?, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: What's in a "name"?, Adam M. Costello
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), D. J. Bernstein
  • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dan Kohn
    • RE: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Henry Spencer
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
• re: running code (was: rfc 2047 and gatewaying), Keith Moore
• Call for Usefor to recharter, Dan Kohn
  • Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, ned+ietf-822
    • Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Russ Allbery
    • Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Charles Lindsey
  • UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier
    • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keld Jørn Simonsen
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keld Jørn Simonsen
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
    • Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Dan Kohn
  • RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Erland Sommarskog
  • Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Jean-Marc Desperrier
  • RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Dan Kohn
    • RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Erland Sommarskog
    • Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Bruce Lilly
• Domains to try in double bounce processing., Leo Bicknell
  • Re: Domains to try in double bounce processing., Keith Moore
• RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
  • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
    • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Claus Färber
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Nick Shelness
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Claus Färber
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Claus Färber
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Tony Hansen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Pete Resnick
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Running code (Was: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Pete Resnick
      • Message not available
      • Re: Running code (Was: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Andrew Gierth
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)), Andrew Gierth
      • Re: Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)), Philip Hazel
      • Re: Unicode principles (Was Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying)), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: UTF-8 versions (was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Jacob Palme
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • [OT] mUTF-7 in IMAP, Marc Mutz
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Lawrence Greenfield
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Sam Roberts
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, ned+ietf-822
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • old format date fields (was Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Keith Moore
      • Re: old format date fields (was Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: old format date fields (was Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Jean-Marc Desperrier
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dan Kohn
    • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Kai Henningsen
    • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • prevervation of installed base, Dave Crocker
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Dave Crocker
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Andrew Gierth
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Russ Allbery
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Keld Jørn Simonsen
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: prevervation of installed base, Charles Lindsey
  • RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dan Kohn
  • RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dan Kohn
  • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
    • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Jean-Marc Desperrier
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Leo Bicknell
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Russ Allbery
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dave Crocker
  • RE: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Dan Kohn
  • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Henry Spencer
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Henry Spencer
      • For shame (Was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: For shame (Was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: For shame (Was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Andrew Gierth
      • Re: For shame (Was: Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: RFC 2047 and gatewaying, Bruce Lilly
• The sad state of MIME non-compliance, Bruce Lilly
  • Re: The sad state of MIME non-compliance, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• eMail address variation contra mail-spam - thanks for the replies...., Juergen Helbing
• Newbie question: eMail address variation contra mail-spam ?, Juergen Helbing
  • Re: Newbie question: eMail address variation contra mail-spam ?, Michael Elkins
  • Re: Newbie question: eMail address variation contra mail-spam ?, Keith Moore
    • Re: Newbie question: eMail address variation contra mail-spam ?, ned+ietf-822

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.