Archive of ietf-822/old-archive1, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-822/old-archive1

Page 6 of 8
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Mark Crispin, Wed, 13 Nov 91 02:57:16 EST
Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 13 Nov 91 01:00:42 EST
Re: ISO 2022, Masahiro SEKIGUCHI, Tue, 12 Nov 91 23:56:11 EST
Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Louis A. Mamakos, Tue, 12 Nov 91 22:37:34 EST
Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Bill Janssen, Tue, 12 Nov 91 22:09:17 EST
Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 12 Nov 91 22:02:15 EST
Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, jknowles, Tue, 12 Nov 91 19:03:27 EST
re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Mark Crispin, Tue, 12 Nov 91 15:17:47 EST
Re: ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 12 Nov 91 13:02:34 EST
ISO-2022 as a separate RFC, Neil Katin, Tue, 12 Nov 91 09:10:57 EST
ISO 2022, Randall Atkinson, Tue, 12 Nov 91 08:26:50 EST
Re: audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 12 Nov 91 01:25:07 EST
Re: checksums on open issues list, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 11 Nov 91 19:40:22 EST
Re: checksums on open issues list, James M Galvin, Mon, 11 Nov 91 16:47:01 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin, Mon, 11 Nov 91 16:22:11 EST
Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 11 Nov 91 15:36:13 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 11 Nov 91 14:28:55 EST
Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Dave Crocker, Mon, 11 Nov 91 10:43:08 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, John C Klensin, Mon, 11 Nov 91 10:11:56 EST
Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, John C Klensin, Mon, 11 Nov 91 09:54:07 EST
Re: RFC XXXX's proper domain, Einar Stefferud, Sun, 10 Nov 91 23:29:30 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin, Sun, 10 Nov 91 22:34:06 EST
Re: RFC XXXX's proper domain, Paul A Vixie, Sun, 10 Nov 91 20:53:29 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Neil Katin, Sun, 10 Nov 91 19:27:35 EST
RFC XXXX's proper domain, Dave Crocker, Sun, 10 Nov 91 18:51:22 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Sven-Ove Westberg, Sun, 10 Nov 91 07:07:51 EST
Re: NETF and EUnet on mnemonic, Sven-Ove Westberg, Sun, 10 Nov 91 06:49:21 EST
re: checksums on open issues list, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Sat, 9 Nov 91 10:20:03 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 9 Nov 91 09:00:32 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 8 Nov 91 17:18:18 EST
re: checksums on open issues list, Mark Crispin, Fri, 8 Nov 91 17:02:27 EST
checksums on open issues list, henry, Fri, 8 Nov 91 15:53:50 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Dave Crocker, Fri, 8 Nov 91 11:32:15 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Marshall Rose, Fri, 8 Nov 91 11:15:37 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Timo Lehtinen, Fri, 8 Nov 91 10:50:36 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 8 Nov 91 09:20:18 EST
Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 8 Nov 91 09:01:49 EST
Re: PLEASE READ - Open Issues..., John C Klensin, Fri, 8 Nov 91 02:58:45 EST
Re: PLEASE READ - Open Issues..., Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 7 Nov 91 23:53:49 EST
Re: PLEASE READ - Open Issues..., David Robinson, Thu, 7 Nov 91 21:27:19 EST
Re: Different approach to defining encodings, David Robinson, Thu, 7 Nov 91 21:10:49 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Marshall Rose, Thu, 7 Nov 91 20:27:27 EST
Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Neil Katin, Thu, 7 Nov 91 16:59:44 EST
Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Nov 91 15:34:55 EST
Re: PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Nov 91 07:03:36 EST
audio, checksums, and trojan horses, Bill Janssen, Thu, 7 Nov 91 04:50:04 EST
PLEASE READ -- Open issues list for RFC-XXXX, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 7 Nov 91 02:53:16 EST
A different approach..., David Robinson, Wed, 6 Nov 91 21:54:25 EST
Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Timo Lehtinen, Wed, 6 Nov 91 20:21:10 EST
Re: Different approach to defining encodings, david, Wed, 6 Nov 91 18:28:18 EST
Different approach to defining encodings, David Robinson, Wed, 6 Nov 91 13:21:48 EST
Re: Is ? a distinguished character in UUCP mail?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 5 Nov 91 01:03:25 EST
Is ? a distinguished character in UUCP mail?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Mon, 4 Nov 91 03:49:17 EST
Re: New Audio Stuff, david, Fri, 1 Nov 91 18:43:52 EST
Audio redux, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Nov 91 16:14:33 EST
New Audio Stuff, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Nov 91 14:55:05 EST
Metamail release, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Nov 91 14:48:42 EST
Re: checksums, Neil Katin, Fri, 1 Nov 91 13:07:17 EST
Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Nov 91 11:54:11 EST
Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Dave Crocker, Fri, 1 Nov 91 00:03:18 EST
Re: checksums, James M Galvin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 21:44:29 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Mark Crispin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 20:40:23 EST
re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Mark Crispin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 20:28:09 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, James M Galvin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 20:05:04 EST
Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, James M Galvin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 20:03:20 EST
Re: checksums, James M Galvin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 19:49:19 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript consideredharmful), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 31 Oct 91 17:16:56 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Louis A. Mamakos, Thu, 31 Oct 91 16:37:50 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Bill Janssen, Thu, 31 Oct 91 14:32:49 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Bill Janssen, Thu, 31 Oct 91 14:28:37 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, henry, Thu, 31 Oct 91 12:52:11 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript consideredharmful), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 31 Oct 91 12:00:36 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Keith Moore, Thu, 31 Oct 91 11:00:43 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., david, Thu, 31 Oct 91 09:20:04 EST
RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 31 Oct 91 08:25:51 EST
Re: checksums, James M Galvin, Thu, 31 Oct 91 07:57:09 EST
Security Issues, Randall Atkinson, Thu, 31 Oct 91 07:37:25 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 31 Oct 91 07:20:39 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript consideredharmful), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 31 Oct 91 05:32:46 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose, Thu, 31 Oct 91 01:58:51 EST
filename= headers in mail, emv, Thu, 31 Oct 91 00:30:25 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Keith Moore, Thu, 31 Oct 91 00:17:14 EST
Re: AUDIO silences, Bill Janssen, Wed, 30 Oct 91 22:20:38 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Neil Katin, Wed, 30 Oct 91 22:20:01 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Bill Janssen, Wed, 30 Oct 91 22:10:47 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Bill Janssen, Wed, 30 Oct 91 21:52:45 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose, Wed, 30 Oct 91 21:26:35 EST
Re: checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 30 Oct 91 20:52:35 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 30 Oct 91 20:33:44 EST
Re: checksums, Keith Moore, Wed, 30 Oct 91 20:12:52 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose, Wed, 30 Oct 91 19:18:58 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Keith Moore, Wed, 30 Oct 91 19:03:17 EST
Re: base64 and checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 30 Oct 91 17:24:20 EST
Re: content-charset and ISO-2022, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Wed, 30 Oct 91 16:49:08 EST
Re: content-charset and ISO-2022, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 16:24:16 EST
checksums, James M Galvin, Wed, 30 Oct 91 16:02:45 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Rudy_Nedved, Wed, 30 Oct 91 16:02:04 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 16:00:44 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Neil Katin, Wed, 30 Oct 91 15:59:44 EST
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 1991 15:58:52 -0500 (EST)
trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Keith Moore, Wed, 30 Oct 91 15:48:38 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 15:26:00 EST
Re: Audio type, Guido van Rossum, Wed, 30 Oct 91 15:10:54 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Guido van Rossum, Wed, 30 Oct 91 14:56:28 EST
base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose, Wed, 30 Oct 91 14:16:43 EST
content-charset and ISO-2022, Neil Katin, Wed, 30 Oct 91 13:51:02 EST
UTF misunderstanding, David Robinson, Wed, 30 Oct 91 13:46:30 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Dave Crocker, Wed, 30 Oct 91 11:53:24 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Craig_Everhart, Wed, 30 Oct 91 11:49:40 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 11:22:40 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 11:16:39 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Timo Lehtinen, Wed, 30 Oct 91 10:59:54 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Guido van Rossum, Wed, 30 Oct 91 10:41:32 EST
Re: Audio type, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 09:02:35 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Guido van Rossum, Wed, 30 Oct 91 13:11:12 +0100
Re: Mark's recent notes .., Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:52:57 EST
Re: AUDIO silences, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:51:17 EST
Re: more content-charset, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:45:46 EST
Re: checksums in RFC XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:42:50 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:40:36 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:34:13 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 91 06:16:15 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 30 Oct 1991 06:16:03 -0500 (EST)
Re: Audio type, Marshall Rose, Wed, 30 Oct 91 05:55:40 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Guido van Rossum, Wed, 30 Oct 91 04:33:19 EST
Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 30 Oct 91 00:35:58 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 30 Oct 91 00:22:40 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 30 Oct 91 00:15:08 EST
Re: AUDIO silences, Bob Smart, Tue, 29 Oct 91 22:58:55 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 29 Oct 91 21:35:07 EST
Mark's recent notes .., david, Tue, 29 Oct 91 20:21:53 EST
AUDIO silences, Klensin, Tue, 29 Oct 91 19:36:24 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 29 Oct 91 18:03:07 EST
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 29 Oct 91 17:54:10 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 29 Oct 91 17:44:48 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore, Tue, 29 Oct 91 17:31:45 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Eliot Lear, Tue, 29 Oct 91 17:26:13 EST
more content-charset, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Tue, 29 Oct 91 17:03:24 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Keith Moore, Tue, 29 Oct 91 16:31:35 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Tue, 29 Oct 91 15:58:13 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Tue, 29 Oct 91 15:44:10 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, James M Galvin, Tue, 29 Oct 91 15:10:56 EST
checksums in RFC XXXX, James M Galvin, Tue, 29 Oct 91 14:34:18 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Timo Lehtinen, Tue, 29 Oct 91 14:25:33 EST
encodings, base-64, etc., henry, Tue, 29 Oct 91 14:10:17 EST
Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Erik E. Fair" (Your Friendly Postmaster), Tue, 29 Oct 91 14:08:32 EST
Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), Dave Crocker, Tue, 29 Oct 91 12:43:56 EST
Re: EBCDIC, Dave Crocker, Tue, 29 Oct 91 12:09:04 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Neil Katin, Tue, 29 Oct 91 11:38:25 EST
agreement on checksum & features, Randall Atkinson, Tue, 29 Oct 91 10:52:17 EST
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 29 Oct 91 09:35:52 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 29 Oct 91 09:18:43 EST
several comments on RFC-XXXX, Guido van Rossum, Tue, 29 Oct 91 06:12:13 EST
Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Tue, 29 Oct 91 03:52:47 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Bob Smart, Tue, 29 Oct 91 02:17:09 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Valdis Kletnieks, Tue, 29 Oct 91 00:03:59 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 21:53:26 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 28 Oct 91 21:50:33 EST
ISO-2022, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 21:28:32 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Neil Katin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 21:07:43 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 20:59:40 EST
Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 20:49:07 EST
plain-text checksums considered useless, henry, Mon, 28 Oct 91 19:13:29 EST
Re: Audio type, Neil Katin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 17:56:41 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 17:07:45 EST
Re: checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 17:03:13 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 17:00:53 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 28 Oct 91 16:21:33 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 28 Oct 91 16:06:58 EST
Re: checksums, James M Galvin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 16:04:12 EST
Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), David J. Camp, Mon, 28 Oct 91 15:54:25 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:51:57 EST
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:31:13 EST
Samples are fixed, have at 'em, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:28:48 EST
Re: more content-charset stuff, Marshall Rose, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:25:38 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:04:13 EST
re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:00:46 EST
Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), James M Galvin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 13:43:27 EST
Re: content-charset & checksums, Randall Atkinson, Mon, 28 Oct 91 13:32:47 EST
mnemonic, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 28 Oct 91 13:22:49 EST
Re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 13:20:20 EST
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Dave Crocker, Mon, 28 Oct 91 13:13:25 EST
Re: more content-charset stuff, Dave Crocker, Mon, 28 Oct 91 12:55:42 EST
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, henry, Mon, 28 Oct 91 12:37:03 EST
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Dave Crocker, Mon, 28 Oct 91 11:53:19 EST
AUDIO, anyone?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 11:19:17 EST
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Dave Crocker, Mon, 28 Oct 91 11:13:09 EST
content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 28 Oct 91 10:25:53 EST
Agenda of Santa Fe Message Format Extensions WG, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 28 Oct 91 09:35:24 EST
developments with 10646, KLENSIN, Mon, 28 Oct 91 04:53:28 EST
developments with 10646, KLENSIN, Mon, 28 Oct 91 04:21:41 EST
speaking now..., KLENSIN, Mon, 28 Oct 91 04:20:51 EST
Re: more content-charset stuff, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 28 Oct 91 03:46:05 EST
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Mon, 28 Oct 91 02:35:17 EST
more content-charset, Mark Crispin, Mon, 28 Oct 91 02:18:56 EST
Re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin, Sun, 27 Oct 91 21:44:01 EST
Re: more content-charset stuff, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 27 Oct 91 16:53:29 EST
Re: developments with 10646, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sun, 27 Oct 91 13:04:45 EST
Re: developments with 10646, Johnny Eriksson, Sun, 27 Oct 91 11:26:39 EST
developments with 10646, KLENSIN, Sun, 27 Oct 91 10:12:13 EST
developments with 10646, KLENSIN, Sun, 27 Oct 91 10:11:17 EST
speaking now..., KLENSIN, Sun, 27 Oct 91 10:11:10 EST
Re: Multi-level content-types, Nathaniel Borenstein, Sat, 26 Oct 91 10:44:16 EDT
SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE, Bob Smart, Sat, 26 Oct 91 07:08:13 EDT
re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin, Sat, 26 Oct 91 00:44:07 EDT
Re: Audio type, Edward Vielmetti, Fri, 25 Oct 91 23:13:44 EDT
Re: transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, Bill Janssen, Fri, 25 Oct 91 22:06:26 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keith Moore, Fri, 25 Oct 91 18:51:22 EDT
Multi-level content-types, david, Fri, 25 Oct 91 16:49:56 EDT
Re: Troff preprocessors and macro files, RL "Bob" Morgan, Fri, 25 Oct 91 16:35:47 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 25 Oct 91 15:57:11 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 25 Oct 91 15:39:06 EDT
re: more content-charset stuff, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 25 Oct 91 15:28:51 EDT
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore, Fri, 25 Oct 91 14:06:48 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keith Moore, Fri, 25 Oct 91 13:55:39 EDT
Re: transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 25 Oct 91 13:53:29 EDT
Re: TABS and arithmetic, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 25 Oct 91 13:50:47 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, henry, Fri, 25 Oct 91 13:49:37 EDT
Re: My "samples" directory, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 25 Oct 91 13:45:34 EDT
Re: Troff preprocessors and macro files (was Re: comments on October draft), henry, Fri, 25 Oct 91 13:36:21 EDT
Re: My "samples" directory, Valdis Kletnieks, Fri, 25 Oct 91 12:58:56 EDT
Re: transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, John Noerenberg, Fri, 25 Oct 91 11:44:07 EDT
TABS and arithmetic, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Fri, 25 Oct 91 10:45:12 EDT
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Fri, 25 Oct 91 10:30:00 EDT
My "samples" directory, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 25 Oct 91 10:06:37 EDT
Re: more content-charset stuff, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 25 Oct 91 10:03:57 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 25 Oct 91 09:25:18 EDT
transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, KLENSIN, Fri, 25 Oct 91 05:27:55 EDT
Troff preprocessors and macro files (was Re: comments on October draft), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Fri, 25 Oct 91 05:15:51 EDT
RFC-XXXX torture test, Mark Crispin, Fri, 25 Oct 91 04:34:09 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, Julian Onions, Fri, 25 Oct 91 04:04:38 EDT
re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin, Fri, 25 Oct 91 03:08:27 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Bob Smart, Fri, 25 Oct 91 00:26:05 EDT
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal fornon-ASCII chars in headers), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 24 Oct 91 20:05:39 EDT
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 24 Oct 91 19:09:54 EDT
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore, Thu, 24 Oct 91 18:12:58 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, jknowles, Thu, 24 Oct 91 17:28:27 EDT
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 24 Oct 91 17:15:04 EDT
more content-charset stuff, Neil Katin, Thu, 24 Oct 91 16:38:35 EDT
re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin, Thu, 24 Oct 91 16:21:00 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, henry, Thu, 24 Oct 91 15:01:04 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Thu, 24 Oct 91 14:38:33 EDT
SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal f, GTL, Thu, 24 Oct 91 14:06:21 EDT
Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Vincent Lau, Thu, 24 Oct 91 13:58:28 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, Marshall Rose, Thu, 24 Oct 91 13:45:57 EDT
SAMPLE RFC-XXXX messages, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 24 Oct 91 13:15:30 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, henry, Thu, 24 Oct 91 12:20:31 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, Timo Lehtinen, Thu, 24 Oct 91 11:50:48 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 24 Oct 91 10:28:33 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 24 Oct 91 10:04:03 EDT
Re: another bad idea of mine, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 24 Oct 91 10:00:32 EDT
SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 24 Oct 91 09:49:31 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, Marshall Rose, Thu, 24 Oct 91 06:51:23 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Thu, 24 Oct 91 06:05:23 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Thu, 24 Oct 91 04:51:01 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Thu, 24 Oct 91 04:50:20 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, david, Wed, 23 Oct 91 18:23:42 EDT
another bad idea of mine, Mark Crispin, Wed, 23 Oct 91 16:54:18 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Wed, 23 Oct 91 16:51:04 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Wed, 23 Oct 91 16:33:05 EDT
Re: recommended encoding for RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Wed, 23 Oct 91 16:29:39 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Wed, 23 Oct 91 13:29:29 -0700
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Wed, 23 Oct 91 15:37:09 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Wed, 23 Oct 1991 12:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Note on RFC-XXXX, David Herron, Wed, 23 Oct 91 15:29:30 EDT
Re: Audio type, Mitch Kapor, Wed, 23 Oct 91 14:49:26 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Wed, 23 Oct 91 13:29:45 EDT
Re: recommended encoding for RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Wed, 23 Oct 91 13:19:27 EDT
Re: programming efforts?, jknowles, Wed, 23 Oct 91 12:49:41 EDT
Re: comments on October draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 23 Oct 91 11:09:21 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 23 Oct 91 10:18:06 EDT
comments on October draft, Randall Atkinson, Wed, 23 Oct 91 09:51:52 EDT
Re: programming efforts?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 23 Oct 91 05:08:00 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Wed, 23 Oct 91 03:38:31 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 23 Oct 91 03:18:51 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 23 Oct 91 02:29:05 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Wed, 23 Oct 91 02:07:29 EDT
ISO 2022, MNEMONIC, etc, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 23 Oct 91 01:27:25 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Wed, 23 Oct 91 00:57:12 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Tue, 22 Oct 91 21:51:09 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Tue, 22 Oct 91 19:52:46 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Tue, 22 Oct 91 19:47:21 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Tue, 22 Oct 91 19:18:32 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 22 Oct 91 16:27:28 EDT
Re: recommended encoding for RFC-XXXX, Randall Atkinson, Tue, 22 Oct 91 13:53:58 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 22 Oct 91 13:10:43 EDT
Status of MH XXXX implementation, Marshall Rose, Tue, 22 Oct 91 12:47:24 EDT
Re: ISO-2022 & RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 22 Oct 91 12:22:37 EDT
RFC-XXXX and DIS2 of ISO 10646, Walt Daniels, Tue, 22 Oct 91 10:32:05 EDT
Universal Code Set (UCS) update, Walt Daniels, Tue, 22 Oct 91 10:30:51 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 22 Oct 91 10:07:38 EDT
ISO-2022 & RFC-XXXX, Randall Atkinson, Tue, 22 Oct 91 08:53:12 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik E. Fair" (Your Friendly Postmaster), Tue, 22 Oct 91 05:41:21 EDT
SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Tue, 22 Oct 91 04:57:23 EDT
Audio type, Marshall Rose, Tue, 22 Oct 91 04:01:21 EDT
Re: new draft of RFC-XXXX again, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 22 Oct 91 04:01:16 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 22 Oct 91 03:56:53 EDT
Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose, Tue, 22 Oct 91 03:50:51 EDT
Re: programming efforts?, Marshall Rose, Tue, 22 Oct 91 03:40:18 EDT
new draft of RFC-XXXX again, Mark Crispin, Tue, 22 Oct 91 00:39:32 EDT
more on draft, Mark Crispin, Tue, 22 Oct 91 00:24:20 EDT
SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin, Tue, 22 Oct 91 00:21:20 EDT
Re: X.400 and extra headers (about stripping them), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 21 Oct 91 20:31:18 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Keith Moore, Mon, 21 Oct 91 18:50:15 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 21 Oct 91 17:25:29 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Mon, 21 Oct 91 16:51:50 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 21 Oct 91 16:49:59 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 21 Oct 91 16:25:46 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 21 Oct 91 15:13:08 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Mon, 21 Oct 91 14:42:44 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Keith Moore, Mon, 21 Oct 91 14:32:07 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Uhhyung Choi, Mon, 21 Oct 91 13:43:22 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Randall Atkinson, Mon, 21 Oct 91 13:08:02 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, John C Klensin, Mon, 21 Oct 91 12:56:05 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, John C Klensin, Mon, 21 Oct 91 12:33:48 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 21 Oct 91 12:31:43 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Craig_Everhart, Mon, 21 Oct 91 12:15:49 EDT
X.400 and extra headers (about stripping them), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Mon, 21 Oct 91 10:30:50 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 21 Oct 91 10:23:27 EDT
Re: programming efforts?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 21 Oct 91 10:21:20 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 21 Oct 91 10:12:04 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 21 Oct 91 10:04:33 EDT
programming efforts?, Guido van Rossum, Mon, 21 Oct 91 07:51:40 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Randall Atkinson, Mon, 21 Oct 91 07:47:42 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Randall Atkinson, Mon, 21 Oct 91 07:37:12 EDT
Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Bob Smart, Mon, 21 Oct 91 06:42:21 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik E. Fair" (Your Friendly Postmaster), Mon, 21 Oct 91 05:14:41 EDT
Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Keith Moore, Mon, 21 Oct 91 01:04:05 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 20 Oct 91 21:35:20 EDT
Mnemonic header proposal: Japanese problems, separation problems, Bob Smart, Sun, 20 Oct 91 21:22:13 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 20 Oct 91 20:08:08 EDT
Unsubscribe, grants, Sun, 20 Oct 91 18:55:23 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Sun, 20 Oct 91 17:33:21 EDT
[no subject], Gershon M. Kagan, Sun, 20 Oct 91 14:34:40 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sun, 20 Oct 91 10:14:30 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, John C Klensin, Sun, 20 Oct 91 09:54:04 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sun, 20 Oct 91 09:40:50 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 20 Oct 91 06:10:23 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 20 Oct 91 05:41:18 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 20 Oct 91 05:28:45 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, John C Klensin, Sun, 20 Oct 91 05:22:23 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 20 Oct 91 05:15:49 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 20 Oct 91 04:54:43 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 20 Oct 91 03:21:30 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart, Sun, 20 Oct 91 02:25:58 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart, Sun, 20 Oct 91 00:07:04 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Sat, 19 Oct 91 23:38:24 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart, Sat, 19 Oct 91 23:10:21 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Sat, 19 Oct 91 12:13:54 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Sat, 19 Oct 91 12:04:54 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, John C Klensin, Sat, 19 Oct 91 10:31:47 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Sat, 19 Oct 91 09:23:55 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 19 Oct 91 08:37:32 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 19 Oct 91 08:12:44 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, John C Klensin, Sat, 19 Oct 91 06:27:26 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 19 Oct 91 05:45:01 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart, Sat, 19 Oct 91 05:33:51 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 19 Oct 91 04:50:33 EDT
Encoded-Variable scheme, Erik M. van der Poel, Sat, 19 Oct 91 04:07:29 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel, Sat, 19 Oct 91 03:46:58 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel, Sat, 19 Oct 91 02:50:28 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Sat, 19 Oct 91 02:31:22 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel, Sat, 19 Oct 91 02:26:38 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart, Sat, 19 Oct 91 00:18:39 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 20:34:32 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Mark Crispin, Fri, 18 Oct 91 19:09:53 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 18:57:10 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin, Fri, 18 Oct 91 18:33:49 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 17:51:26 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Mark Crispin, Fri, 18 Oct 91 17:49:04 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 18 Oct 91 16:01:56 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 18 Oct 91 13:10:03 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 18 Oct 91 10:50:15 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 18 Oct 91 09:42:29 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 08:57:35 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Erik M. van der Poel, Fri, 18 Oct 91 08:44:06 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 07:49:29 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Randall Atkinson, Fri, 18 Oct 91 07:34:46 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Fri, 18 Oct 91 07:21:30 EDT
Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 05:34:06 EDT
Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Fri, 18 Oct 91 05:05:32 EDT
Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart, Fri, 18 Oct 91 03:53:39 EDT
new draft of SMTP/DIS10646, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 17 Oct 91 21:27:10 EDT
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 17 Oct 91 20:43:04 EDT
Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 17 Oct 91 15:33:14 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 17 Oct 91 13:03:17 EDT
Re: NEW proposal on encoded-headers, Erik M. van der Poel, Thu, 17 Oct 91 01:29:53 EDT
Nathaniel gets his name in lights, Neil Katin, Wed, 16 Oct 91 19:43:39 EDT
Re: NEW VERSION of RFC-XXXX, henry, Wed, 16 Oct 91 14:16:58 EDT
Re: 2 points for rfc-xxxx, henry, Wed, 16 Oct 91 14:14:52 EDT
re: NEW proposal on encoded-headers, Mark Crispin, Wed, 16 Oct 91 14:09:13 EDT
NEW VERSION of RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 16 Oct 91 11:28:29 EDT
NEW proposal on encoded-headers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Wed, 16 Oct 91 08:58:30 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, KLENSIN, Tue, 15 Oct 91 11:53:24 EDT
Re: 2 points for rfc-xxxx, KLENSIN, Tue, 15 Oct 91 11:49:06 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Mark Crispin, Mon, 14 Oct 91 17:21:39 EDT
Re: 2 points for rfc-xxxx, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 14 Oct 91 16:39:44 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 14 Oct 91 12:11:35 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Dave Crocker, Mon, 14 Oct 91 11:40:19 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 14 Oct 91 10:43:45 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Sven-Ove Westberg, Mon, 14 Oct 91 08:18:03 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Johnny Eriksson, Mon, 14 Oct 91 07:55:01 EDT
2 points for rfc-xxxx, Bob Smart, Mon, 14 Oct 91 06:06:19 EDT
Re: Basic requirements of a message, Sven-Ove Westberg, Mon, 14 Oct 91 05:49:07 EDT
re: Basic requirements of a message, Mark Crispin, Mon, 14 Oct 91 05:09:58 EDT
re: Basic requirements of a message, Dan Oscarsson, Mon, 14 Oct 91 03:39:39 EDT
re: Basic requirements of a message, Mark Crispin, Thu, 10 Oct 91 05:06:36 EDT
Basic requirements of a message, Dan Oscarsson, Thu, 10 Oct 91 04:03:46 EDT
Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Tue, 8 Oct 91 11:52:28 EDT
Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, Andy Hooper, Tue, 8 Oct 91 07:58:48 EDT
Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 7 Oct 91 16:03:48 EDT
Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, jwagner, Mon, 7 Oct 91 12:30:49 EDT
Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, guido, Mon, 7 Oct 91 07:59:42 EDT
NETF and non-ASCII headers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Mon, 7 Oct 91 07:05:01 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Fri, 4 Oct 91 00:36:32 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii, Thu, 3 Oct 91 15:07:26 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin, Thu, 3 Oct 91 14:43:41 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, henry, Thu, 3 Oct 91 12:21:55 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Dave Crocker, Thu, 3 Oct 91 10:14:52 EDT
Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Dave Crocker, Thu, 3 Oct 91 10:00:23 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 3 Oct 91 07:07:10 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Thu, 3 Oct 91 04:14:31 EDT
Unsubscribe, Anders Johansson, Thu, 3 Oct 91 03:45:34 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, feldmark, Thu, 3 Oct 91 01:33:23 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin, Wed, 2 Oct 91 21:33:12 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin, Wed, 2 Oct 91 19:41:04 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin, Wed, 2 Oct 91 17:36:52 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii, Wed, 2 Oct 91 17:33:51 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii, Wed, 2 Oct 91 17:33:49 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, feldmark, Wed, 2 Oct 91 15:44:45 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin, Wed, 2 Oct 91 14:12:53 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin, Wed, 2 Oct 91 10:05:37 EDT
Re: header encodings, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 2 Oct 91 08:08:03 EDT
Re: header encodings, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Wed, 2 Oct 91 05:46:29 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Wed, 2 Oct 91 04:09:28 EDT
Re: header encodings, John C Klensin, Wed, 2 Oct 91 03:01:46 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 1 Oct 91 22:20:00 EDT
header encodings, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 1 Oct 91 22:06:24 EDT
Re: multiple types in Content-Type, Bill Janssen, Tue, 1 Oct 91 17:23:30 EDT
Re: multiple types in Content-Type, Jim Knowles, Tue, 1 Oct 91 13:32:04 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 1 Oct 91 13:25:25 EDT
Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 1 Oct 91 13:12:18 EDT
THE CHAIR RESPONDS Was: The KTH-proposal, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 1 Oct 91 13:07:45 EDT
Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Peter Svanberg, Tue, 1 Oct 91 12:56:03 EDT
Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Dave Crocker, Tue, 1 Oct 91 11:38:01 EDT
Re: Mnemonic & Asian languages, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 1 Oct 91 10:57:46 EDT
Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, John C Klensin, Tue, 1 Oct 91 10:04:19 EDT
The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Patrik F{ltstr|m, Tue, 1 Oct 91 07:58:38 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 30 Sep 91 23:19:42 EDT
Re: Mnemonic & Asian languages, Bob Smart, Mon, 30 Sep 91 22:21:17 EDT
multiple types in Content-Type, Bill Janssen, Mon, 30 Sep 91 21:16:53 EDT
Re: multiple languages in the headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 30 Sep 91 20:06:15 EDT
multiple languages in the headers, Neil Katin, Mon, 30 Sep 91 18:01:41 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin, Mon, 30 Sep 91 17:59:14 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin, Mon, 30 Sep 91 15:36:47 EDT
Re: RichText, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 30 Sep 91 15:28:27 EDT
RichText, Olle Jarnefors, Mon, 30 Sep 91 13:12:55 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin, Mon, 30 Sep 91 13:00:46 EDT
Unsubscribe me, Duane Kimball, Mon, 30 Sep 91 11:42:07 EDT
Broken mailer somewhere, Richard Foulk, Mon, 30 Sep 91 10:41:10 EDT
Enough, already!, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 30 Sep 91 10:30:46 EDT
Re: Mnemonic & Asian languages, atkinson, Mon, 30 Sep 91 08:05:38 EDT
Re: Encapsulation boundary algorithms, James H. Thompson - HNL, Mon, 30 Sep 91 04:22:17 EDT
mnemonics for Japanese, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 29 Sep 91 23:09:19 EDT
Encapsulation boundary algorithms, Michael A. Patton, Sun, 29 Sep 91 13:04:50 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sun, 29 Sep 91 10:32:34 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Patrik F{ltstr|m, Sun, 29 Sep 91 06:01:02 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 29 Sep 91 05:32:12 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 29 Sep 91 04:30:30 EDT
Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 28 Sep 91 23:25:12 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Sat, 28 Sep 91 21:46:19 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Sat, 28 Sep 91 21:46:14 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Sat, 28 Sep 91 21:46:14 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Sat, 28 Sep 91 21:46:07 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Bob Smart, Sat, 28 Sep 91 21:30:30 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, John C Klensin, Sat, 28 Sep 91 19:08:04 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 28 Sep 91 18:12:51 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, henry, Sat, 28 Sep 91 18:12:30 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 28 Sep 91 18:02:31 EDT
SMTP/8 and 822/8 further discussion..., David Robinson, Sat, 28 Sep 91 18:02:22 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 28 Sep 91 17:34:54 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 28 Sep 91 17:04:22 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Mark Crispin, Sat, 28 Sep 91 14:17:49 EDT
non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin, Sat, 28 Sep 91 10:04:58 EDT
Re: Why current RFC-XXXX is unsuitable for non-English languages (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Patrik F{ltstr|m, Sat, 28 Sep 91 09:56:55 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Patrik F{ltstr|m, Sat, 28 Sep 91 09:33:34 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Sat, 28 Sep 91 09:21:50 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Sat, 28 Sep 91 09:18:22 EDT
[no subject], 0000-Admin(0000, Sat, 28 Sep 91 09:12:13 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Bob Smart, Sat, 28 Sep 91 08:26:22 EDT
Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 28 Sep 91 07:05:06 EDT
Re: Why current RFC-XXXX is unsuitable for non-English languages (Re:Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 28 Sep 91 06:46:46 EDT
Re: SMTP/8 and 822/8 ... Questions and Answers (cont. 1), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 28 Sep 91 06:31:45 EDT
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem, Fri, 27 Sep 91 23:35:24 HST
Re: Grist for the XXX mill..., Marshall Rose, Sat, 28 Sep 91 01:36:22 EDT
Grist for the XXX mill..., Einar Stefferud, Fri, 27 Sep 91 23:36:44 EDT
Why current RFC-XXXX is unsuitable for non-English languages (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Olle Jarnefors, Fri, 27 Sep 91 21:02:32 EDT
Priorities and why RFC-XXXX don't have to be delayed (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Olle Jarnefors, Fri, 27 Sep 91 21:00:19 EDT
Must the rest of us email "under private agreement"? (Re: What we're trying to achieve), Olle Jarnefors, Fri, 27 Sep 91 20:55:52 EDT
A simple extension of the machinery already there (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Olle Jarnefors, Fri, 27 Sep 91 20:51:05 EDT

Page 6 of 8
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.