[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format

To: Stef@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
From: egreshko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ed Greshko)
Date: Sun, 26 May 91 11:41:59 JST
Cc: nsb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>; from "Einar Stefferud" at May 25, 91 4:02 pm
Reply-to: egreshko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> 
> But, this 186,000 BYTE PS version message clogged my dialup mail
> channel for the better part of 5 hours today.  Good thing it was not
> on a workday!

	Not to mention that my dialup connection is Tokyo===>USA.
Let's see....500Yen/minute * 300 minutes = 150000Yen / 135Yen per dollar.
$1111.11 .... Humm....now where did I put the combination to the safe?? :-)

	Regards,
			Ed

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein

References:
- 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
  - From: Einar Stefferud

Prev by Date: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
Next by Date: Re: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
Previous by thread: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
Next by thread: Re: 183,000 BYTES Re: RFC-XXXX-May, PostScript format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread