[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: applicability of Rich Text Format for e-mail

To: ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: applicability of Rich Text Format for e-mail
From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1991 09:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: moore@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <>

Excerpts from internet.ietf-822: 4-Jun-91 applicability of Rich Text ..
Keith Moore@cs.utk.edu (1562)

> Since the names "Rich Text Format" and RTF are already in use, it might
> be a good
> idea to change the name in RFC XXXX from "richmail" to something else, so as to
> distinguish one from the other.  How about "working-class-text"? :-)

I love it!   As John Lennon said, "A working class hero is something to be!"  

Seriously, your point about the name confusion is well-taken.  Any other
suggestions?

References:
- applicability of Rich Text Format for e-mail
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: comments on may draft
Next by Date: Re: source of RTF specification
Previous by thread: Re: applicability of Rich Text Format for e-mail
Next by thread: Re: applicability of Rich Text Format for e-mail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread