[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)

To: ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info-metamail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)
From: Neal_McBurnett@xxxxxxx (Neal McBurnett)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 17:37:29 MDT
In-reply-to: <>
References: <><>

I agree with Edward Vielmetti.
I want MIME for the headers, not the rich text.
Define Content types for existing formats, and wait for the
battle over standard text formats to settle out a little.
Add the "setext" format (used in TidBITS) to his list - very simple,
readable stuff: **bold**, _underlined_, etc.

Neal_McBurnett@ATT.COM (Neal McBurnett)	303-538-4852	AT&T Bell Labs, Denver

References:
- RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)
  - From: Edward Vielmetti

Prev by Date: Re: printable wide character (was "multibyte") encodings
Next by Date: Re: SGML, RichText, etc.
Previous by thread: Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)
Next by thread: Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread