[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 16/32-bit charsets and MIME-encoding

To: Dan.Oscarsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 16/32-bit charsets and MIME-encoding
From: John C Klensin <KLENSIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 07:08:34 -0500 (EST)
Cc: ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
Mail-system-version: <MultiNet-MM(335)+TOPSLIB(156)+PMDF(4.2)@INFOODS.UNU.EDU>

Dan Oscarsson writes, in part...

>With the expected character coding to use
>in the future in MIME to be ISO 10646 instead of ISO 8859-*, ascii or others
>as character coding in message transfer.

Very simple question, independent of any of the other issues:

Have we agreed on this?  

There was certainly intent to agree when RFC1341 came out, but my
impression of the recent discussions is that we certainly do not have
agreement on this principle today.

   ---john

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16/32-bit charsets and MIME-encoding
  - From: Dave Crocker

References:
- 16/32-bit charsets and MIME-encoding
  - From: Dan Oscarsson

Prev by Date: RE: simplemail (formerly simpletext) and referential markup
Next by Date: Re: New content types
Previous by thread: 16/32-bit charsets and MIME-encoding
Next by thread: Re: 16/32-bit charsets and MIME-encoding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread