10646, moving towards a proposal.

[dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Walt Daniels)]

>It may be that 10646.2 diverges from this, lacking access to a copy of the spec
>for 10646.2 I cannot say, but I have been told that 10646.1 is point/point
>equivalent to Unicode, so it should have preserved this distinction.
>dana s emery <de19@umail.umd.edu>

ISO 10646 preserves the Devanagri distinctions.  They are not on my
list of changes from Unicode 1.0 to Unicode 1.1 so they must be as in
Unicode 1.0.